NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/2314/2008

VARISHTHA SHAKHA PRABANDHAK SANCHALAK ZILA SAHKARI GRAMYA VIKAS VIKAS BANK & ANR - Complainant(s)

Versus

SAMAY SINGH RATHORE - Opp.Party(s)

MR. SUNIL K. JAIN `

16 Jul 2008

ORDER

Date of Filing: 27 May 2008

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIRevision Petition(RP) No. RP/2314/2008
(Against the Order dated 18/02/2008 in Appeal No. 364/2007 of the State Commission Uttaranchal)
1. VARISHTHA SHAKHA PRABANDHAK SANCHALAK ZILA SAHKARI GRAMYA VIKAS VIKAS BANK & ANR HaridwarHaridwarUttrakhand2. BRANCH MANAGER,U.P. Sahkari Gram Vikas Bank, Branch LuxorHaridwarUttrakhand ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. SAMAY SINGH RATHORE Resident of Village Hussainpur, Post Office,HaridwarUttrakhand ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.B. SHAH ,PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. ANUPAM DASGUPTA ,MEMBER
For the Appellant :For MR. SUNIL K. JAIN `,(Mr. Aneesh Mittal, advo. for Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain)
For the Respondent :

Dated : 16 Jul 2008
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

          Heard the Ld. counsel for the petitioner.

          In our view, the impugned order passed by the State Commission does not call for interference.  The matter was settled in Lok Adalat before the District Forum.

          Apart from this, the complainant has not availed any loan facility.  Therefore, he is entitled to get back the surety amount.


          Hence, revision petition is dismissed.



......................JM.B. SHAHPRESIDENT
......................ANUPAM DASGUPTAMEMBER