Haryana

Panchkula

CC/28/2022

UDAI SINGH - Complainant(s)

Versus

SAMAR ESTATE PVT.LTD - Opp.Party(s)

PARMINDER SINGH & ROHIT GOSWAMI.

18 Oct 2022

ORDER

C.C.No.28 of 2022

 

Udai Singh Vs.Samar Estate Pvt. Ltd.

 

Present:             Sh.Rohit Goswani, Advocate for the complainant.

                       

        Fresh address not filed. Perusal of the file reveals that on 24.05.2022, the complainant was directed to furnish the fresh address of OP within 15 days and case was adjourned to 28.07.2022. On 28.07.2022 fresh address was not filed and the ld.counsel for the complainant had sought time for filing fresh address and case was adjourned to 07.09.2022. In the meanwhile, the learned counsel filed the fresh address of OP on 12.08.2022 and accordingly fresh notice was issued to OP at its both addresses. On 07.09.2022, notice issued to OP at its both address through process server received back with the report as “Door locked” and case is adjourned to 18.10.2022 for filing fresh address of OP. Today, again the fresh address of OP has not been provided. No justification has been provided for non furnishing of the address of OP. The case has been adjourned several times for providing the correct address of OP but the same has not been made available so far. In these circumstances, we are of the view that no useful purpose is being served by repeatedly adjourning the matter for the same purpose. In our opinion, it would be appropriate to adjourn the case Sine Die till the correct address of the OP is provided by the complainant to the Commission, and we order accordingly. However, it is made clear that the complainant shall be at liberty to get the present complaint restored at its original number as and when she is able to provide the correct address of the OP.

 

Dt. 18.10.2022            Member                 Member             President