Kerala

Palakkad

CC/78/2021

Ahas H Das - Complainant(s)

Versus

Salman Shaikh - Opp.Party(s)

16 Mar 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PALAKKAD
Near District Panchayath Office, Palakkad - 678 001, Kerala
 
Complaint Case No. CC/78/2021
( Date of Filing : 27 Apr 2021 )
 
1. Ahas H Das
Souhridam, Aiswarya Nagar, Moorkkattu Parambu P.O, Pattambi, Pin- 679 303
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Salman Shaikh
C/o. Ithunt, MV House, Near Sheethal Dairy, Opp. Riyaz Cafe, Jamalpur, Ahmedabad, Gujarat- 380 001
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Vinay Menon.V PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Vidya A MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 16 Mar 2022
Final Order / Judgement

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PALAKKAD

Dated this the 16th day of March, 2022

 

Present    :  Sri.Vinay Menon V.,  President

                :  Smt.Vidya A., Member

                                                                                                            Date of filing : 22/4/2021

     CC/78/2021

Ahas H Das,

Souhridam,

Aiswarya Nagar,

Moorkkattuparambu,

PO Pattambi 679 303.

 (Party in person)                                                        -           Complainant

 

                                                                                      Vs

Salman Shaik,

C/o.IT Hunt,

“M.V.House”,

Near Sheethal Diary,

Opp.Riyas Cafe,

Jamalpur,  Ahamedabad,

Gujarath – 380 001                                                      -                      Opposite party

(Exparte)

O R D E R 

 

 

By Sri. Vinay Menon V.,  President

 

  1.  The complainant is aggrieved by the allegedly defective Asrock h110 pro BTC + motherboard which he claims to have purchased from the opposite party.
  2. The opposite party did not enter appearance and was set exparte. Therefore this matter was posted for exparte evidence of the complainant to 17/1/22.
  3. The complainant was continuously absent on 9/11/21, 24/11/21 & 17/1/22. Since the complaint was absent on 11/3/22 also this complaint was taken up for orders based on merits.
  4. The complainant has produced two documents viz a tax invoice bearing No.ITH/20-21/1076 dated 9/2/2021 for an amount of Rs.10350/- issued by the  opposite party and 3 sheets of print out of whatsapp communication. The aforesaid documents does not corroborate the complaint pleadings. Nor will it substantiate the case of the complainant.
  5. Hence, the complaint is dismissed.

 .    

            Pronounced in the open court on this the  16th day of March, 2022.

 Sd/-

                                                                           Vinay Menon V.

                                                 President

 

 Sd/-

Vidya A.

                    Member      

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Vinay Menon.V]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Vidya A]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.