Kerala

StateCommission

A/11/656

MANAGER,SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE CO - Complainant(s)

Versus

SALIM.T.C - Opp.Party(s)

NARAYAN.R

24 Feb 2012

ORDER

Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Vazhuthacaud,Thiruvananthapuram
 
First Appeal No. A/11/656
(Arisen out of Order Dated 31/05/2011 in Case No. CC/10/160 of District Kottayam)
 
1. MANAGER,SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE CO
KOTTAYAM BRANCH
KOTTAYAM
KERALA
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. SALIM.T.C
TATHAMPARA HOUSE,NEAR KIRLAMAKKAL JUMA MASJID,PUNJAVAYAL.P.O
KOTTAYAM
KERALA
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONARABLE MR. JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU PRESIDENT
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACAD, THIURVANANTHAPURAM

 

FIRST APPEAL 656/2011

JUDGMENT DATED: 24..2..12

PRESENT

JUSTICE SRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU  : PRESIDENT

 

Manager,                                            : APPELLANT

Shriram Transport Finance Co.Ltd,

Kottayam.

(By Adv.Narayan.R)

 

          Vs.

1. Salim.T.C.,                                     : RESPONDENTS

    Tathampara House,

    Near Kirlamakkal Juma Masjid,

    Punjavayal.P.O.,

    Kottayam.

 

2. Anupam Finance (India) Ltd.,

    Rep.by its Managing Director

    9, Kandappamudali Street,

    Elephant Gate, Chennai.

 

3. Branhc Manager,

    Anupam Finance (India) Ltd.,

    Near Travancore Cement Junction,

    Nattakom.P.O., Kottayam.

 

JUDGMENT

 

JUSTICE SRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU  : PRESIDENT

 

 

            The appellant is the 3rd opposite party in CC.160/10 in the file of CDRF, Kottayam. The opposite parties including the appellant are under                                                                                                                                      orders to return the vehicle documents,  duplicate key and un used cheque leaves to the complainant  and also to pay Rs.5000/- as compensation and Rs.1000/- as costs.

          2. It is the case of the appellant that appellant has only refinanced the arrangements made by opposite parties 1 and 2 another finance company and hence the appellant is not in possession of the documents etc. 

          3. The 3rd opposite party/appellant was ex-parte before the Forum. 

          4. The appellant has sought for an opportunity to contest the matter.  In the circumstance  the order of the Forum is set aside on condition that the appellant pay a sum of Rs.3000/- towards cost to the complainant or deposit the same before the Forum which can be withdrawn by the complainant.  On payment of cost the Forum will permit the 3rd opposite party to contest the matter and dispose of the case after considering the contentions of the 3rd opposite party as well.

          5. The case will stands posted before the Forum on 30..3..2012.

          Office will forward the copy of this order to the Forum.

 

 

          JUSTICE SRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU  : PRESIDENT

 

ps

 

 

 
 
[HONARABLE MR. JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU]
PRESIDENT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.