Goa

StateCommission

A/17/2014

Suresh Raikar - Complainant(s)

Versus

Salgaonkar Medical Research Centre & another - Opp.Party(s)

28 Mar 2014

ORDER

Goa State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Panaji-Goa
 
First Appeal No. A/17/2014
(Arisen out of Order Dated 17/01/2014 in Case No. CC/78/2013 of District South Goa)
 
1. Suresh Raikar
Kamakshi Vihar,145 G/1, Fatima Colony, Alto Dabolim Goa
South
Goa
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Salgaonkar Medical Research Centre & another
Director Shri. Dattaraj Salgaonkar, VM Salgaonkar Bros. Pvt. Ltd. Salgaonkar House, Annexe Bldg, Near Vegetable Market, Vasco da Gama, Goa
South
Goa
2. Dr. Rajesh Jhaverani
Salgaonkar Medical Research Ventre, Airport Road, Chicalim Goa
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONABLE MR. JUSTICE N.A.Britto PRESIDENT
 HONABLE MRS. Smt.Vidhya R. Gurav MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
ORDER

The complainant was treated in OP No. 1 hospital from 04/08/2014 till 06/08/2012 and as far as the treatment is concerned the complainant seems to have no grievance at all either against OP No. 1 hospital or OP No. 2 Dr. Jhaverani. The entire case of the complainant is based on the alleged advice given by OP No. 2 Dr. Jhaverani to complinant's wife and son to admit him to IPHB because of the conduct of the complainant while in OP No. 1 hospital. The complainant would submit that the said advice, given by OP No. 2 Dr. Jhaverani amount to medical negligence. We are afraid we cannot accept such a submission. It is common knowledge that those who suffer from bouts of migraine do become irritable. It is quite probable that it was due to migraine that the complainant shouted at the staff of the ICU. However, mere advice to complainant's wife and son, to get the complainant admitted to another hospital, even if such hospital is OPHB, would not amount to medical negligence. The complainant might or might not have been admitted to IPHB. That he ran therefrom is another matter. That the complainant would have been detained in IPHB and given an injection is only a figment of complainant's imagination.

Complaint filed by the complainant was not rightly admitted by the Lr. District Forum. Appeal, therefore, is hereby dismissed.

 
 
[HONABLE MR. JUSTICE N.A.Britto]
PRESIDENT
 
[HONABLE MRS. Smt.Vidhya R. Gurav]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.