West Bengal

StateCommission

RC/4/2011

Sri Dilip Kumar Khedia. - Complainant(s)

Versus

Sakun Apartment Flat Owners' - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. Prabir Basu.

13 Jun 2011

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
WEST BENGAL
BHABANI BHAWAN (Gr. Floor),
31, Belvedere Road, Kolkata - 700027
 
RP No. 4 Of 2011
(Arisen out of Order Dated 06/01/2011 in Case No. EA/26/2009 of District Purulia DF, Purulia)
 
1. Sri Dilip Kumar Khedia.
S/o Late Onkarmall Khedia, promoter of Sakun Apartment, Ranchi Road, Purulia, P.O. & Dist. Purulia.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Sakun Apartment Flat Owners'
Co-operative Housing Society Limited, Represented by the Secretary of the Society, Ranchi Road, Purulia, P.O. & Dist. Purulia.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRABIR KUMAR SAMANTA PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. SILPI MAJUMDER Member
 
For the Petitioner:Mr. Prabir Basu., Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. P. R. Sinha Sarkar., Advocate
ORDER

No. 3/13.06.2011.

 

HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI PRABIR KUMAR SAMANTA, PRESIDENT.

 

Revision Petitioner through Mr. Prabir Basu, the Ld. Advocate and O.P. through Mr. P. R. Sinha Sarkar, the Ld. Advocate are present.  O.P. files BNA.

 

This revisional application is directed against the order dated 06.01.2011 passed by the Forum below in execution case No. 26 of 2009.  JDR is the Revisional Petitioner who filed an application for rejecting the report as filed by the Executive Engineer, Western Electrical Division – II, PWD with further direction upon him to submit a fresh report in this regard.  It appears from the order dated 15.10.2009 passed by the Forum below in the aforesaid execution case that Divisional Engineer, PWD, Purulia Division was appointed as Commissioner for inspection of Blocks A, B & 3 of Sakun Apartment for causing an inspection and submitting report as to whether steel handle pairs fixed the staircase of the said Blocks in the above building have been made smooth for movement of the inhabitants or not.  The said order was passed in presence of the JDR – Petitioner.  The JDR – Petitioner did never challenge the said order in any higher Forum.  Pursuant to the said order the said Commissioner has submitted a report.  The JDR has also miserably failed to establish that the said report was bad on the strength of any material whatsoever before the Forum below.  Further by order dated 17.06.2010 passed in the aforesaid execution case the Executive Engineer, PWD Electrical Purta Bhawan, 1st Floor, Burdwan, West Bengal was requested to send estimate for installing lightening arrester in the above premises as per the reports submitted by the Divisional Manager, Purulia (D) dated 22.05.2010.  This order also has not been challenged by the JDR in any higher Forum.  Pursuant to the aforesaid orders the Executive Engineer, PWD has submitted his report dated 21.12.2010 before the Forum below.  The JDR – Petitioner has further miserably failed to challenge the said report of the Executive Engineer on the strength of any cogent material. 

 

In this revisional application neither any case has been made out nor any material has been produced to show that the said report dated 21.12.2010 as submitted by the Executive Engineer, PWD, Western Electrical Division – II was perfunctory or perverse.  In the absence of such material the challenge as made by the JDR – Petitioner in relation to the said report must fail.  Hence we do not find any illegality or material irregularity in the order passed by the Forum below.  This revisional application is accordingly dismissed.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRABIR KUMAR SAMANTA]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MRS. SILPI MAJUMDER]
Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.