Uttarakhand

StateCommission

A/154/2020

Smt. Rajdulari - Complainant(s)

Versus

Sai Diagnostic Centre - Opp.Party(s)

Sh. Sanjay Yadev

09 Aug 2023

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,UTTARAKHAND
23/16, Circular Road, Dalanwala, Dehradun, Uttarakhand 248001
Dehradun-248001
Final Order
 
First Appeal No. A/154/2020
( Date of Filing : 03 Dec 2020 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 22/07/2020 in Case No. CC/366/2016 of District Haridwar)
 
1. Smt. Rajdulari
W/o Subhas Chand, Village- Fehrupur, Post- Dhanpura, Tehsil- haridwar
Haridwar
Uttarakhand
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Sai Diagnostic Centre
G-3-4 Super Complex In Front Of Premnagar Ashram, Jwalapur
Haridwar
Uttarakhand
2. Dr. Sateesh Chandra
C/o Sai Diagnostic Centre G-3-4 Super Complex Infront Of Premnagar Ashram Jawalapur
Haridwar
Uttarakhand
3. National Insurance Company
Through Branch Manager 710-711 Sotiganj Infont of Sehgal Motors
Meerut
Uttar Pradesh
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.S. Tripathi PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Udai Singh Tolia MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 09 Aug 2023
Final Order / Judgement

Case is called out.

None is present on behalf of the appellant and respondent Nos. 1 & 2.

Sh. Sudhanshu Dwivedi, learned counsel for respondent No. 3 is present.

Perusal of record reveals that none was also present on behalf of the appellant on the previous date, i.e., 19.07.2023, on which date, following order was passed by this Commission:

“Case is called out.

None is present on behalf of the appellant and respondent Nos. 1 & 2.

Sh. Vineet Sachdeva, Advocate, holding brief of Sh. Sudhanshu Dwivedi, learned counsel for respondent No. 3 is present.

According to office report dated 19.07.2023, registered court notice was issued to the appellant on 03.06.2023, which is not received back in the office as yet.

Office has submitted the tracking report of registered court notice issued to the appellant, according to which, item has been delivered.  Accordingly, service of registered court notice upon the appellant is held to be sufficient.

In the interest of justice, one opportunity is provided to the appellant.

Put up on 09.08.2023 for further orders.”

Inspite of that, none has appeared on behalf of the appellant even today.

No adjournment application has been moved on behalf of the appellant.

It appears that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the appeal.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed in default of the appellant.

Let the record be consigned.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.S. Tripathi]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Udai Singh Tolia]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.