Maharashtra

Chandrapur

CC/21/157

Shri. Suresh Atmaram Ramteke - Complainant(s)

Versus

Sahayak Vyavasthapak / Shakha Adhikari Chandrapur Zilla Madyavarti Sahakari Bank Branch Sindewahi - Opp.Party(s)

P.N.Jange

16 Feb 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION
CHANDRAPUR
 
Complaint Case No. CC/21/157
( Date of Filing : 09 Sep 2021 )
 
1. Shri. Suresh Atmaram Ramteke
Dr.Ambedkar Nagar,Sindewahi,Tah.Sindewahi,Dist.Chandrapur
Chandrapur
Maharashtra
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Sahayak Vyavasthapak / Shakha Adhikari Chandrapur Zilla Madyavarti Sahakari Bank Branch Sindewahi
Sindewahi,Tah.Sindewahi,Dist.Chandrapur
Chandrapur
Maharashtra
2. Vibhagiya Adhikari, Vibhagiya Karyalay Chandrapur Zilla Madhyavarti Sahakari Bank,Bramhapuri
Bramhapuri,Tah.Bramhapuri,Dist.Chandrapur
Chandrapur
Maharashtra
3. Mukhya Karyakari Adhikari, Chandrapur Zilla Madhyavarti Sahakari Bank Chandrapur Pramukh Karyalay
Civil Line Chandrapur
Chandrapur
Maharashtra
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Atul D.Alsi PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Kirti Vaidya Gadgil MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. Kalpana Jangade Kute MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 16 Feb 2022
Final Order / Judgement

ORDER

(Passed on 16/2/2022)

Passed below Application of OP raising preliminary objection

The complainant availed cash credit loan facility for Rs.4,00,000/- (Four lac only) by morgaging house property of father as co owner. The complaint cash credit Limit is extended till December,2017 & the account become non payment Asset therefore the OP started recovery proceeding under securitization and Reconstruction of financial Asset & enforcement of security interest Act,2002. The Bank issued notice U/s 13(2) of the Act,2002. 

            The complaint submitted that the procedure & recovery of loan under the Act 2002 is unlawful & non renual of cash credit facility does amount to deficiency of service. Hence the complaint has merit in case. therefore the present application is not tenable.

             Admitted that the OP Bank started the recovery proceding under the Act,2002 and the complainant has right to file appeal or revision before appellate authority. There is no symulteneous proceeding on same cause of action is tenable before Forum. The complaint has right to approach before special recovery officer nominated under the Act,2002 by Bank or if aggrieved can approach before appellate authority. Hence the present petition has no merit about negligency of service and thereby claiming compensation. Hence application for dropping the proceeding by preliminary application to objection on the ground of tenability is allowed and case is disposed of. 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Atul D.Alsi]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Kirti Vaidya Gadgil]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Kalpana Jangade Kute]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.