Shama Jahan filed a consumer case on 29 Mar 2023 against Saharayan Universal Multi Purpose Society Ltd. in the North East Consumer Court. The case no is CC/40/2022 and the judgment uploaded on 11 Apr 2023.
Delhi
North East
CC/40/2022
Shama Jahan - Complainant(s)
Versus
Saharayan Universal Multi Purpose Society Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)
29 Mar 2023
ORDER
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION: NORTH-EAST
R/o 1462, Gali No. 48, Near Gubad Wali Masjid, Jafrabad, Delhi-110053
Complainant
Versus
1.
2.
3.
4.
Saharayan Universal
Multipurpose Society Ltd.
301-302, Shivam Commercial Complex
3rd Floor Karampura, New Delhi-110015
Sahara Q Shop Unique Product Range Ltd.,
Shivam complex IIIrd Kardampura,
New Delhi-110015
D.K Shukla(Branch Manager)
301-302, Shivam Commercial Complex,
3rd Floor Karampura,
New Delhi-110015
J.P. Rai (Rahul Raj) Regional Manager
301-302, Shivam Commercial Complex,
3rd Floor Karampura,
New Delhi-110015
Opposite Parties
DATE OF INSTITUTION:
JUDGMENT RESERVED ON:
DATE OF ORDER:
23.02.2022
08.02.2023
29.03.2023
CORAM:
Surinder Kumar Sharma, President
Anil Kumar Bamba, Member
ORDER
Anil Kumar Bamba, Member
The Complainant has filed the present complaint under Section 35 of the Consumer protection Act, 2019.
Case of the Complainant
The case of the Complainant as revealed from the record is that the complainant had invested for sum of Rs. 14/- per day since 21.03.1997 to 2012, in Sahara Co. After Complainant had invested Rs. 25,150/- in the Q Shop for six year from 15.05.2012 to 2018. The Q shop had merged in the New Company Saharayan Universal Multipurpose Society Ltd., in the year of 2018. After the merging, Complainant had purchased a new bond on 31.03.2018 from Saharayan Universal Multipurpose Society Ltd. and total amount was deposit/maturity amount is due Rs. 55,591/- vide receipt no. 467004152251 on 31.03.2018. At the time of receiving the said amount from the Complainant, company assured to complainant to provide benefit/profit to the Complainant but the Company had failed to provide the same, when the Company failed to provide the same, the complainant number of times requested the Opposite Parties to return the hard earnest money of the complainant along with profit/interest, but the Opposite Parties always made one excused to another instead of satisfactory reply regarding the same. The complainant had prayed to direct the Opposite Parties to return Rs. 55,591/- along with profit or 24 % interest p.a, which were invested/deposited by the complainant, Rs. 15,000/- to the complainant for mental torture, financial loss and harassment and Rs. 10,000/-on account of legal charges, court fees and other expenses.
None has appeared on behalf of Opposite Parties to contest the case. Therefore, Opposite Parties were proceeded against Ex-parte vide order dated 19.05.2022.
Ex-parte evidence of the Complainant
The Complainant in support of her complaint filed her affidavit wherein she has supported the averments made in the complaint.
Arguments & Conclusion
We have heard the Complainant and we have also perused the file. The averments made by the Complainant in the complaint are supported by her affidavit and documents filed by her. The Opposite Party did not appear and did not file any written statement. Therefore, the averments made in the complaint are to be believed.
In view of the above discussion, the complaint is allowed. Opposite Parties are directed to pay jointly or severally Rs. 55,591/- to the Complainant along with interest @ 6 % p.a from the date of filing the complaint till recovery. Opposite Parties are also directed to pay jointly or severally an amount of Rs. 10,000/- to the Complainant on account of mental harassment and litigation expenses along with interest @ 6 % p.a. from the date of this order till recovery.
Order announced on 29.03.2023.
Copy of this order be given to the parties free of cost
File be consigned to Record Room.
(Anil Kumar Bamba)
Member
(Surinder Kumar Sharma)
President
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.