View 2230 Cases Against Sahara Q Shop
Rajesh Sharma filed a consumer case on 23 Nov 2023 against Sahara Q Shop in the Ambala Consumer Court. The case no is EA/61/2022 and the judgment uploaded on 05 Dec 2023.
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, AMBALA.
Execution Application | : | 61 of 2022 |
Date of Institution | : | 14.07.2022 |
Date of decision | : | 23.11.2023 |
Rajesh Sharma, aged 47 years, son of Shri Dinesh Sharma being natural guardian and father of minor daughter Anishka Sharma (aged 9 years), r/o 8, Sawan Vihar, Behind B.D.Flour Mill, Ambala Cantt.
...Decree Holder
Versus
.…. JDs/Opposite Parties.
Before: Smt. Neena Sandhu, President.
Smt. Ruby Sharma, Member,
Shri Vinod Kumar Sharma, Member.
Present: Shri Pawan Kumar Goel Advocate, counsel for the decree holder/complainant.
Shri Manish Sharma, Advocate, counsel for JDs/OPs.
Order: Smt. Neena Sandhu, President.
The decree holder has filed the present execution application stating therein that the Decree Holder/complainant has filed the consumer complaint against the JDs/OPs and the same has been allowed by this Commission vide order dated 06.04.2022 and the JDs/OPs were directed to pay Rs.1,12,500/- i.e the maturity amount of Certificate No.933000367229, to the DH/complainant along with interest @ 9% per annum from the respective date of maturity, till its realization. To pay Rs.5,000/- as compensation and Rs.3,000/- as litigation expenses. The JDs/OPs have failed to pay the awarded amount, as such the DH/complainant has left with no other option but to file the present application. It is prayed that the JDs/OPs may be punished with imprisonment for a term of upto 3 years and fine upto Rs.1,00,000/- for non-payment of the awarded amount.
2. Today, the case was fixed for filing correct address of JDs/OPs. However, Shri Manish Sharma, Advocate appeared on behalf of JDs/OPs and submitted that the power of attorney which he had filed in the main complaint case may be treated in this execution application also. He while relying upon the case Pinak Pani Mohanty Versus Union of India and Others with W.P.(C)No.6/2023(X),( 29.03.2023 passed in I.A. bearing No.56308 of 2023 in Writ Petition(Civil) No.191 of 2022) decided by the Hon’ble Supreme Court submitted that as per this order, the question of genuineness of the claims of the depositors/investors with the Sahara Group of Cooperative Societies is to be exclusively determined by the Special Authority and the manner and modalities for making the payment is to be worked out by it in consultation with Hon’ble Justice R. Subhash Reddy, Former Judge of the Apex Court and Sh. Gaurav Agarwal, Amicus Curiae and for that purpose an amount of Rs.5000/- Crores has been ordered to be transferred to the Special Authority out of “Sahra-SEBI Refund Account” for further disbursal of the same against legitimate dues of the depositors of the Sahara Group of Cooperative Societies, as such, now this execution application is not maintainable before this Commission and the decree holders should be relegated to the the Central Registrar of Cooperative Societies for disbursement of their due amount.
“3. Having heard Shri Tushar Mehta, learned Solicitor General appearing on behalf of the Union of India and taking into consideration the facts narrated hereinabove and when it is reported that Rs. 2253 Crores had been taken out of the Sahara Credit Cooperative Society Ltd., i.e., one of the four Sahara Group Multi-State Cooperative Societies and deposited with SEBI in the “Sahara-SEBI Refund Account” and the amount lying in the “Sahara-SEBI Refund Account” is lying unutilized and the genuine depositors of the Sahara Group of Cooperative Societies, which otherwise, shall be entitled to get back their money, the prayer sought in the present application seems to be reasonable and which shall be in the larger public interest / interest of the genuine depositors of the Sahara Group of Cooperative Societies. Therefore, the present application stands disposed of with the following directions:-
Out of the total amount of Rs. 24,979.67 Crores lying in the “Sahara-SEBI Refund Account”, Rs. 5000 Crores be transferred to the Central Registrar of Cooperative Societies, who, in turn, shall disburse the same against the legitimate dues of the depositors of the Sahara Group of Cooperative Societies, which shall be paid to the genuine depositors in the most transparent manner and on proper identification and on submitting proof of their deposits and proof of their claims and to be deposited in their respective bank accounts directly.
The disbursement shall be supervised and monitored by Justice R. Subhash Reddy, Former Judge of this Court with the able assistance of Shri Gaurav Agarwal, learned Advocate, who is appointed as Amicus Curiae to assist Justice R. Subhash Reddy as well as the Central Registrar of Cooperative Societies in disbursing the amount to the genuine depositors of the Sahara Group of Cooperative Societies. The manner and modalities for making the payment is to be worked out by the Central Registrar of Cooperative Societies in consultation with Justice R. Subhash Reddy, Former Judge of this Court and Shri Gaurav Agarwal, learned Advocate.
X xxxx xxx xx. Xxxx xxx
We direct that the amount be paid to the respective genuine depositors of the Sahara Group of Cooperative Societies out of the aforesaid amount of Rs. 5,000 Crores at the earliest, but not later than nine months from today. The balance amount thereafter be again transferred to the “Sahara-SEBI Refund Account”.
From the aforesaid order passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court titled as Pinak Pani Mohant Vs. Union of India & Ors (supra), it is clear that the question of genuineness of the claims of the depositors/investors with the Sahara Group of Cooperative Societies is to be exclusively determined by the Special Authority and the manner and modalities for making the payment is to be worked out by it in consultation with Hon’ble Justice R. Subhash Reddy, Former Judge of the Apex Court and Sh. Gaurav Agarwal, Amicus Curiae and for that purpose an amount of Rs.5000/- Crores has been ordered to be transferred to the Special Authority out of “Sahra-SEBI Refund Account” for further disbursal of the same against legitimate dues of the depositors of the Sahara Group of Cooperative Societies. Since, in the present case also, the complainant’s claim before this Commission is with regard to non-payment of the amounts deposited with the Sahara Group of Cooperative Societies, therefore, we have no hesitation to hold that no authority including this Commission has the power to decide the genuineness of claim or pass directions for disbursal of the claim except the Special Authority authorized by the Hon’ble Apex Court vide the aforesaid order.
Announced:- 23.11.2023
(Vinod Kumar Sharma) | (Ruby Sharma) | (Neena Sandhu) |
Member | Member | President |
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.