View 2238 Cases Against Sahara Q Shop
Vijay Kumar filed a consumer case on 02 Sep 2021 against Sahara Q Shop Unique Producs Range Limited in the Ludhiana Consumer Court. The case no is CC/20/341 and the judgment uploaded on 09 Sep 2021.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, LUDHIANA.
Complaint No: 341 dated 09.12.2020.
Date of decision: 02.09.2021.
Vijay Kumar, aged about 41 years son of Sh. Chunni Lal, resident of # 1248, Near Mata Gujri Ji Gurudwara, Haibowal Khurd, Ludhiana, District Ludhiana. ..…Complainant
Versus
Complaint under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
QUORUM:
SH. K.K. KAREER, PRESIDENT
SH. JASWINDER SINGH, MEMBER
COUNSEL FOR THE PARTIES:
For complainant : Sh. Rajiv Goyal, Advocate.
For OPs. : Exparte.
ORDER
PER K.K. KAREER, PRESIDENT
1. Simply put, the case of the complainant is that he invested a sum of Rs.2000/- on 02.01.2006 with OP2 by way of one FDR for 146 months. As per the terms and conditions of the FDR, the OPs were required to pay a sum of Rs.6,000/- on 02.03.2018. After the date of maturity, when the complainant tried to submit the original FDR in the office of OP2 for encashment, but OP2 refused to receive the same and told the complainant to come after sometime. The complainant visited the office of the OP2 several times, but OP2 did not release the amount. Even a legal notice dated 23.01.2020 served upon the OPs failed to evoke a positive response from them. Hence the complaint, whereby it has been requested that the OPs be directed to pay a sum of Rs.6,000/- with interest along with compensation of Rs.15,000/- and litigation expenses of Rs.10,000/-.
2. Upon notice, OPs did not appear despite service and were proceeded against exparte.
3. In exparte evidence, the complainant submitted her affidavit as Ex. C1 along with documents Ex. C2 to Ex. C5 and closed the evidence.
4. We have heard the counsel for the complainant and have also gone through the record.
5. From the allegations made in the complainant and the affidavit Ex. C1 furnished in support thereof along with documents Ex. C2 to Ex. C5, it is evident that the complainant invested Rs.2,000/- FDR Ex. C2 which was due for maturity on 02.03.2018.
6. It is further in exparte evidence that after the date of maturity when the FDR was presented for encashment by the complainant, the OPs failed to pay the maturity amount to the complainant. This amounts to deficiency of service on the part of the OPs, who are held liable to pay the same along with interest @8% per annum and composite costs of Rs.5,000/-
7. As a result of above discussion, the complaint is allowed exparte with an order that the OPs shall be jointly and severally liable to pay the maturity amount of Rs.6,000/- to the complainant along with interest @8% per annum from 02.03.2018 till date of actual payment. OPs shall further pay a sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) as composite compensation to the complainant. Compliance of the order be made within 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of the order. Copies of order be supplied to parties free of costs as per rules. File be indexed and consigned to record room.
(Jaswinder Singh) (K.K. Kareer)
Member President
Announced in Open Commission.
Dated:02.09.2021.
Gobind Ram.
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.