West Bengal

Alipurduar

CC/17/2022

Smt. Sutapa Dutta Das - Complainant(s)

Versus

Sahara India - Opp.Party(s)

Sri Tarit Sarkar

19 Jul 2023

ORDER

In the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum
Alipurduar
Madhab More, Alipurduar
Pin. 736122
 
Complaint Case No. CC/17/2022
( Date of Filing : 06 Sep 2022 )
 
1. Smt. Sutapa Dutta Das
Atiabari, P.O. Kalchini, P.S. & Dist. Alipurduar
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Sahara India
The Manager, B.F. Road, Newtown, P.O. & P.S. Alipurduar, Pin. 736121
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 JUDGES Shri Santanu Misra PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Rajib Das MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. Smt. Giti Basak Agarwala MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 19 Jul 2023
Final Order / Judgement

The brief facts of the complainant case, is that, the complainant is an Policy Holder of Sahara India Pariwar, Alipurduar Branch(O.P) being Policy Certificate Nos. 925005762910, 925005762911, 925005762912, 925005762913,  Dated – 01/12/2018 and he invested total Rs. 1,17,000/- (Rs. 19,000/- + Rs. 19,000/- + Rs. 39,000/- + Rs. 40,000/- respectively) in different four policies under the scheme “F2 SAHARA .A. SELECT” for a period of 18 months  which the O.P issued four certificates and the maturity date of the above four policies were on 01/06/2020  and the maturity amount was  Rs. 22,097/- + Rs. 22,097/- + Rs. 45,357/- + Rs. 46,520/-.  After the date of maturity of the said investments, the complainant went to the office of the O.P in several times for withdrawal the maturity amount and lastly on 18/07/2022 the complainant sent a legal notice to the O.P for claim of the maturity amount. Thereafter, in different occasions the complainant went to the office of the O.P for getting her maturity amount of the aforesaid investments but the O.P did not release the maturity amount nor communicated anything to the complainant. Finding no other alternatives the complainant file this instant case against the O.P for claiming the maturity amount of Rs. 1, 36,071/- and Rs. 10,000/- for his mental agony, tensions and sufferings and Rs.5, 000/- for his litigation cost.

            The instant case was admitted on 19/09/2022, Order No. 3 and the notice has been issued to the O.P Company and it is seen from the case record that the O.P.  appeared before this Commission on 20/10/2022. After appearing O.P. did not file any written version in order to contest the case. The O.P. filed one petition regarding maintainability of the case and the said petition was disposed of against the O.P. and therefore, the case has been decided to proceed ex-parte against the O.P as per order No. 5 Dated - 29/11/2022.

            In support of the case the complainant has filed evidence-on-affidavit.and Xerox copy of certificates.

            We have gone through the materials on record very carefully and also perused the documents which are lying on record and also heard argument from the Ld. Advocate of the complainant.

            In this context, the following issues are necessarily come up for the proper adjudication of the case.

                                                

                                             POINTS FOR CONSIDERATION

  1. Is the complainant a consumer u/s. 2(7)(ii) of Consumer Protection Act, 2019 ?
  2. Has this Commission jurisdiction to try the instant case?
  3. Is there any deficiency in service on the part of the O.P?
  4. Is the complainant entitled to get any relief/reliefs as prayed for?

 

     DECISION WITH REASONS

            Considering the nature and character of the case all these points are interlinked to each other as such all the points are taken up together for consideration for the sake of brevity and convenience. The case has been filed u/s. 35 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 by the complainant.

Point No. 1:- This is admitted that the complainant invested a total sum of Rs. Rs. 1, 17,000/- (Rs. 19,000/- + Rs. 19,000/- + Rs. 39,000/- + Rs. 40,000/- /- respectively) under the scheme “F2 SAHARA .A. SELECT” on 01/12/2018 for a period of 18 months. So, there is no hesitation to hold that the complainant is a consumer within the meaning under section 2(7)(ii) of the C.P. Act, 2019.

Point No. 2:- It is seen from this case record as well as the evidence of the complainant that the complainant reside and the office of the O.P. situated within the territorial jurisdiction of this Commission. Therefore, this Commission has territorial jurisdiction to try this case as per section 34(d) of the C.P. Act, 2019.

Point Nos. 3 & 4:- These two points are taken up together for discussions for the sake of convenience and brevity. This is fact that the complainant had invested total amount of Rs. 1,17,000/- (Rs. 19,000/- + Rs. 19,000/- + Rs. 39,000/- + Rs. 40,000/- respectively) under the scheme “F2 SAHARA A SELECT” on 01/12/2018 for a period of 18 months. After investment O.P. issued four policy certificates to the complainant. This is also fact that the maturity period of 18 month were already over on 01/06/2020. This is also disputed that the complainant has not yet received any single penny from the O.P. against this aforesaid investments.

We have looked into the complaint copy, evidence-in-chief and Xerox copy of policy certificates filed by the complainant minutely. It appears that the complainant has deposited the amount on 01/12/2018 and four separate certificates have been issued by the O.P. in favour of the complainant and the amount was deposited for the period of 18 months and the maturity date was 01/06/2020. It also appears that after maturity the O.P. did not return the maturity amount to the complainant and the complainant on several occasions visited the office of the O.P. with a request to payment of maturity amount but all are in vain. All these reveal that the complainant is a bona-fide consumer of the O.P. and he is entitled to get maturity amount of Rs. 22,097/- + Rs. 22,097/- + Rs. 45,357/- + Rs. 46,520/- total Rs. 1,36,071/- (according to Xerox copies of certificates). There is no reason to disbelieve the unchallenged case of the complainant as the O.P. did not turn up to contest the same. We find that there is a gross deficiency in service from the side of the O.P. for nonpayment of the maturity amount. Complainant is hereby entitled to get back the maturity amount from the O.P. along with 6% interest per annum. The complainant is also entitled to get a sum of Rs. 10,000/- as compensation for his mental agony, tensions, harassment and sufferings and also entitled to get Rs. 5,000/- for his litigation costs.

Accordingly all the points are decided in favour of the complainant against the O.P.

            Thus all the points are disposed of accordingly.

            Hence, for ends of justice; it is;-

 

                                                                    ORDERED

           that the instant case be and the same is allowed ex-parte with costs against the O.P. The complainant do get the award amounting to Rs. 1,36,071/- (Rupees One Lakh Thirty-Six Thousands Seventy-One) of the maturity amount for aforesaid four policies along with 6% interest Per annum from the  date of maturity till realization and he also do get a further award of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousands) for his mental agony, tensions, harassment and sufferings and also Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) as litigation costs against the O.P; total award amounting to Rs. 1,51,071/- (Rupees One Lakh Fifty-One Thousands Seventy-One) excluding interest. The O.P. (Sahara India) is hereby directed to pay the total award amount along with the interest upon the cost of the maturity amount as stated above till the payment is made to the complainant. The O.P is hereby directed to pay the said award to the complainant within 30 days from the day of receiving this order i.d. legal action will be taken against him.

Let a copy of this final order be sent to the concerned parties through registered post with A/D or by hand forthwith for information and necessary action.

Dictated & Corrected by me

 
 
[JUDGES Shri Santanu Misra]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Rajib Das]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Smt. Giti Basak Agarwala]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.