Haryana

Sirsa

CC/22/389

Sunita - Complainant(s)

Versus

Sahara India Pariwar - Opp.Party(s)

Narender S

25 Apr 2023

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. CC/22/389
( Date of Filing : 10 Jun 2022 )
 
1. Sunita
Near kamboj Gurudwara Fatehabad
Fatehabad
Haryana
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Sahara India Pariwar
Near SBI Bank Main Branch 2 Floor Sirsa
Sirsa
Haryana
2. Sahara India Coop Soc
Office At Sahara India Bhawan 1 kapoorthla Complex Aliganj Lucknow
Lucknow
UP
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  Padam Singh Thakur PRESIDENT
  Sukhdeep Kaur MEMBER
  O.P Tuteja MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Narender S, Advocate for the Complainant 1
 
Dated : 25 Apr 2023
Final Order / Judgement

BEFORE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SIRSA.

                                                          Complaint Case no. 389 of 2022      

                                                          Date of Institution: 10.06.2022

                                                          Date of Decision:   25.04.2023. 

           

Sunita wife of Shri Bhagwan Dass, aged 36 years, resident of near Kamboj Gurudwara, Fatehabad, Tehsil and Distt. Fatehabad.

                                                                   ………Complainant.

                                      Versus

 

1. Sahara India Pariwar cum Sahara India Cooperative Society Ltd., Branch located at adjoining Jyani Hospital, Near State Bank of India, Main Branch, 2nd Floor, Sirsa, Distt. Sirsa, through its Branch Manager.

 

2. Sahara India Cooperative Society Ltd., Reg. Office at Sahara India Bhawan, 1, Kapoorthala Complex, Aliganj, Lucknow- 226024 through its authorized person.

                     ……… Opposite parties.

 

          Complaint under Section 35 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

 

Before:       SH. PADAM SINGH THAKUR………. PRESIDENT

      SMT. SUKHDEEP KAUR……………..MEMBER                      

    SH. OM PARKASH TUTEJA… ……….MEMBER               

         

Argued by:   Sh. Narendra Sharma, Advocate for complainant.

Opposite parties exparte.

                  

ORDER

 

          This complaint has been filed by complainant against the opposite parties seeking payment of Rs.28,465/- as maturity amount alongwith interest besides compensation for harassment and litigation expenses from ops.

2.       In brief, the case of complainant is that complainant deposited her saving amount with the ops in the shape of one FDR with op no.1 i.e. local branch of op no.2 under Saharayn Universal Multipurpose Super BB Society Limited and Sahara A Select, Sahara S. Bhavishya vide receipt and certificate issued by ops, the detail of which is as under:-

(i)      Account/ Control/ ID/ Receipt No. 24847200992 dated 23.07.2018 of Rs.24,308/- maturity amount Rs.28,465/- maturity date was 23.1.2020.

3.       It is further averred that after maturity ops have failed to make payment of the maturity amount to the complainant despite her several requests and visits and have caused unnecessary harassment and mental agony. Hence, this complaint.

4.       On notice, initially opposite parties appeared through counsel and sought adjournments for filing written statement but on 21.11.2022 when the case was fixed for filing written statement and power of attorney on behalf of opposite parties, none appeared on their behalf and as such ops were proceeded against exparte.

5.       Complainant has tendered her affidavit Ex.C1 and receipt/ certificate Ex.C2.

6.       We have heard learned counsel for complainant and have gone through the case file carefully.

7.       From the receipt/ certificate Ex.C2, it is evident that on 23.07.2018 complainant deposited amount of Rs.24,308/- with the ops and on maturity on 23.01.2020 she was entitled to receive amount of Rs.28,465/- from the ops. According to the complainant after maturity the ops have failed to refund the maturity amount to the complainant. The ops despite appearance have failed to rebut the pleadings and evidence of complainant and ultimately opted to be proceeded against exparte. There is nothing on file to disbelieve the version of complainant and that she is not entitled to the maturity amount of Rs.28,465/- from ops. Non payment of amount of complainant clearly amounts to deficiency in service as well as unfair trade practice on the part of ops.

8.       In view of our above discussion, we allow this complaint and direct the opposite parties to pay the amount of Rs.28,465/- alongwith interest @6% per annum from the date of maturity till actual realization to the complainant. We also direct the ops to further pay a sum of Rs.5000/- as composite compensation for harassment and litigation expenses to the complainant. The ops are liable to comply with this order within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order, failing which complainant will be at liberty to initiate proceedings under Section 71/72 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 against the ops. A copy of this order be supplied to the parties free of costs.  File be consigned to record room.

 

Announced:                   Member      Member                President,

Dated: 25.04.2023.                                               District Consumer Disputes

                                                                   Redressal Commission, Sirsa.

 

JK

 

 
 
[ Padam Singh Thakur]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ Sukhdeep Kaur]
MEMBER
 
 
[ O.P Tuteja]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.