Haryana

Sirsa

CC/18/227

Sumit Goyal - Complainant(s)

Versus

Sahara India Pariwar - Opp.Party(s)

Subhash Chander

28 Mar 2019

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. CC/18/227
( Date of Filing : 12 Sep 2018 )
 
1. Sumit Goyal
House No 13/424 Lane 5 Gobind Nagar Hisr Road Sirsa
Sirsa
Haryana
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Sahara India Pariwar
Main Branch 2nd Floor Sirsa
Sirsa
Haryana
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Roshan Lal Ahuja PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Issam Singh Sagwal MEMBER
 HON'BLE MS. Sukhdeep Kaur MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:Subhash Chander, Advocate
For the Opp. Party: JS Sidhu, Advocate
Dated : 28 Mar 2019
Final Order / Judgement

BEFORE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SIRSA.

 

                                                          Complaint Case no.227 of  2018    

                                                          Date of Institution: 12.09.2018

                                                          Date of Decision:   28.03.2019. 

           

Sumit Goyal aged about 38 years son of  Harbans Lal resident of House No.13/424, Lane-5, Gobind Nagar, Hisar Road, Sirsa-125055 (Haryana) being natural guardian and father of minor daughter namely Manvi aged about 7 years.

                                                                                  ………Complainant.

                                      Versus

 

  1. Sahara India Pariwar, Branch Located at adjoining Jyani Hospital, Near State Bank of India Main Branch, 2nd Floor, Sirsa, Tehsil and Distt. Sirsa through its Branch Manager.
  2. Sahara India Pariwar, Sahara India Bhawan, 1, Kapporthala Complex, Aliganj, Lucknow-226024.

 

                              ……… Opposite parties.

 

          Complaint under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

 

Before:       SH. R.L.AHUJA ………………. PRESIDENT

SH.ISSAM SINGH SAGWAL ……MEMBER.

MRS.SUKHDEEP KAUR……………MEMBER      

 

Present:      Sh. Subhash Chander, Advocate for complainant.

Sh. J.S. Sidhu, Advocate for opposite parties.

                  

ORDER

 

          In brief, case of complainant is that he got deposited his saving amount (in the name of her minor daughter namely Manvi) with the Ops in the shape of many FDRs of different amount on different dates and the Op No.1 i.e. local branch of Op No.2 issued the different receipts after depositing the amount and the maturity values of the same are Rs.1,16,300/- till 09.05.2018 and details of all FDRs alongwith maturity value of the FDRs are, as under:

  1. Membership No.925003792990 dated 09.11.2016, principal amount Rs.15,000/-, maturity amount of Rs.17445/- and date of maturity was 09.05.2018.
  2. Membership No.925003792989 dated 09.11.2016, principal amount Rs.17,000/-, maturity amount of Rs.19771/- and date of maturity was 09.05.2018.
  3. Membership No.925003792988 dated 09.11.2016, principal amount Rs.17,000/-, maturity amount of Rs.19771/- and date of maturity was 09.05.2018.
  4. Membership No.925003792987 dated 09.11.2016, principal amount Rs.17,000/-, maturity amount of Rs.19771/- and date of maturity was 09.05.2018.
  5. Membership No.925003792986 dated 09.11.2016, principal amount Rs.17,000/-, maturity amount of Rs.19771/- and date of maturity was 09.05.2018.
  6. Membership No.925003792985 dated 09.11.2016, principal amount Rs.17,000/-, maturity amount of Rs.19771/- and date of maturity was 09.05.2018.           

It is further averred that total amounts have been lying deposited with the Ops and the complainant alongwith his family members and friends have visited the Ops for making the payment and also completed the terms and conditions for getting refund after maturity but the Ops are lingering on the matter on one pretext or the other.  The Ops are legally bound to make the payment of FDRs but their act and conduct makes them deficient in service. Hence, this complaint.

2.                On notice, Ops appeared and filed their joint reply and submitted that Mr.Sumit Goyal is not a member of the society and the present complaint has not been filed in the name of Manvi, who is member of society. If, the member of the society has any grievance or dispute with the society, she is bound to refer the dispute before the Arbitrator as per Arbitration agreement under Clause 11 of the scheme Sahara A.  The membership, as stated, by the complainant is wrong and no amount has been deposited through alleged all membership No.925003792985 to 925003792990. The Ops have never lingered on the matters as the statement made by the complainant is absolutely baseless and against the terms and conditions of the scheme/agreement. According to the agreement no claim can be made beyond the terms and conditions as there is no agreement to provide 12 % compound interest or 24 % p.a. interest rather as per the terms and conditions of clause-4 after date of maturity no interest is payment.  There is no consumer disputes rather, if any, disputes exists the same is between the society and its member, which can be resolved under the provisions of Multi State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002.  It has been further averred that as per the conditions, no additional interest is payable, if the maturity is taken after scheduled period.  There is no deficiency in service on the part of Ops. Other contentions have been controverted and prayer for dismissal of the complaint has been made.

3.                Thereafter, both the parties have led their respective evidence in support of their respective pleadings.

4.                We have heard learned counsel for parties and have perused the case file carefully.

5.                The complainant in order to prove his case has tendered his affidavit Ex.CW1/A, in which, he has reiterated all the facts mentioned in his complaint and also tendered in evidence documents Ex.C1 to Ex.C6, the FDRs receipts in the name of Manvi minor daughter of Sumit Goyal. The details of the receipts, is as, under:

  1. Membership No.925003792990 dated 09.11.2016, principal amount Rs.15,000/-, maturity amount of Rs.17445/- and date of maturity was 09.05.2018.
  2. Membership No.925003792989 dated 09.11.2016, principal amount Rs.17,000/-, maturity amount of Rs.19771/- and date of maturity was 09.05.2018.
  3. Membership No.925003792988 dated 09.11.2016, principal amount Rs.17,000/-, maturity amount of Rs.19771/- and date of maturity was 09.05.2018.
  4. Membership No.925003792987 dated 09.11.2016, principal amount Rs.17,000/-, maturity amount of Rs.19771/- and date of maturity was 09.05.2018.
  5. Membership No.925003792986 dated 09.11.2016, principal amount Rs.17,000/-, maturity amount of Rs.19771/- and date of maturity was 09.05.2018.
  6.  Membership No.925003792985 dated 09.11.2016, principal amount Rs.17,000/-, maturity amount of Rs.19771/- and date of maturity was 09.05.2018.

 

The receipts prove that the amount was deposited by the complainant with the OPs in fixed deposit and this fact has not been denied by the Ops.

6.                          On the other hand, Sh.Parveen Kumar, District Branch Manager, in his affidavit Ex.R1/A has reiterated the facts made in the written statement.  Though he has taken a plea that the complainant has joined as member in the society and got deposited amount with the society and the amount of the complainant is lying deposited with the society, but however, he has not placed on record any document from which it could be presumed that the OP has made payment of the maturity amount of the FDRs to the complainant or they have ever made any offer to the complainant to receive the payment. The Ops have simply placed on record Ex.R2, a blank application form which does not bear signature of the complainant or any other person nor the Ops have placed on record  any statement of account showing the outstanding balance of the complainant against the Ops. Non-payment of the amount of FDRs after the date of maturity by the Ops to the complainant is deficiency in service as well as unfair trade practice on their part.

 7.                         In view of the above, we allow the present complaint and direct the opposite parties to refund the maturity amount of the aforesaid FDRs within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of the order. The Ops are further directed to pay interest at the contractual rate of interest which was agreed between the parties from the date of maturity of the FDRs till the date of filing of the complaint and they are further directed to pay interest @ 7 % per annum from the date of filing of the complaint till its realization. We also direct the ops to further pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- as compensation and Rs.2,000/- on account of litigation expenses to the complainant.  A copy of this order be supplied to the parties free of costs.   File be consigned to record room.

 

 

Pronounced in open Forum.                                       President,

Dated: 28.03.2019.                                        District Consumer Disputes

                                                                         Redressal Forum, Sirsa.

 

                                               

                   Member                         Member                                                              

                DCDRF, Sirsa           DCDRF, Sirsa

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Roshan Lal Ahuja]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. Issam Singh Sagwal]
MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MS. Sukhdeep Kaur]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.