Haryana

Sirsa

CC/23/70

Santi Devi - Complainant(s)

Versus

Sahara India Pariwar - Opp.Party(s)

Narender Sharma

06 Jun 2023

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. CC/23/70
( Date of Filing : 07 Feb 2023 )
 
1. Santi Devi
Village Sakta Khera Distt Sirsa
Sirsa
HaryanaSirsa
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Sahara India Pariwar
Near SBI Bank Main Branch 2 Floor Sirsa
Sirsa
Haryana
2. Sahara India Coop Soc
Office At Sahara India Bhawan 1 kapoorthla Complex Aliganj Lucknow
Lucknow
UP
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  Padam Singh Thakur PRESIDENT
  Sukhdeep Kaur MEMBER
  O.P Tuteja MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Narender Sharma, Advocate for the Complainant 1
 
Dated : 06 Jun 2023
Final Order / Judgement

BEFORE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SIRSA.

                                                          Complaint Case no. 70 of 2023        

                                                          Date of Institution: 07.02.2023

                                                          Date of Decision:   06.06.2023. 

           

Shanti Devi aged about 77 years wife of Shri Mithu Ram, resident of village Sakta Khera, Tehsil Mandi Dabwali, District Sirsa.

 

                                                                   ………Complainant.

                                      Versus

 

1. Sahara India Pariwar cum Sahara India Cooperative Society Ltd., Branch Located at adjoining Jyani Hospital, Near State Bank of India, Main Branch, 2nd Floor, Sirsa, Distt. Sirsa, through its Branch Manager.

 

2. Sahara India Cooperative Society Ltd., Reg. Office at Sahara India Bhawan, 1, Kapoorthala Complex, Aliganj, Lucknow- 226024 through its authorized person.

                    ……… Opposite parties.

 

          Complaint under Section 35 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

 

Before:       SH. PADAM SINGH THAKUR………. PRESIDENT

       SMT. SUKHDEEP KAUR……………..MEMBER                      

         SH. OM PARKASH TUTEJA…………MEMBER        

         

Argued by:   Sh. Narendra Sharma, Advocate for complainant.

Opposite party no.1 given up.                                                           

Opposite party no.2 already exparte.

                  

ORDER BY SMT. SUKHDEEP KAUR, MEMBER:-

 

          This complaint has been filed by complainant against the opposite parties seeking payment of Rs.1,68,200/- as maturity amount alongwith interest besides compensation for harassment and litigation expenses from ops.

2.       In brief, the case of complainant is that complainant deposited her saving amount with the ops in the shape of two FDRs with op no.1 i.e. local branch of op no.2 under Saharayn Universal Multipurpose Star Two Scheme vide receipts and certificates issued by ops, the detail of which is as under:-

          (i)      Account/ Control/ ID/ Receipt No. 34019183300 dated 30.06.2017 of Rs.42,100/- maturity amount Rs.84,200/- maturity date was     30.10.2022. 

       (ii)     Account/ Control/ ID/ Receipt No. 34019183301 dated 30.6.2017   of Rs.42,000/- maturity amount Rs.84,000/- maturity date was     30.10.2022.

3.       It is further averred that after maturity ops have failed to make payment of the maturity amount to the complainant despite her several requests and visits and have caused unnecessary harassment and mental agony. Hence, this complaint.

4.       Notice of the complaint was issued to the opposite parties. Notice issued to op no.1 received back with the report that office was locked and as such op no.1 was given up by learned counsel for complainant. Notice issued to op no.2 sent through registered cover was delivered as per delivery report but none appeared on behalf of op no.2. As such op no.2 was proceeded against exparte.

5.       Complainant has tendered her affidavit Ex.C1 and receipts/ certificates as Annexures C1 and C2.

6.       We have heard learned counsel for complainant and have gone through the case file carefully.

7.       From the receipt/ certificate C1, it is evident that on 30.06.2017 complainant deposited amount of Rs.42,100/- with the ops and according to complainant on maturity on 30.10.2022, she was entitled to receive maturity amount of Rs.84,200/- from ops. Further from receipt/ certificate C2, it is evident that on 30.06.2017 complainant also deposited amount of Rs.42,000/- with the ops and according to complainant on maturity on 30.10.2022, she was entitled to receive maturity amount of Rs.84,000/- from ops. According to the complainant after maturity ops have failed to refund the maturity amounts to the complainant despite her several requests. The opposite party no.2 despite notice has failed to appear and failed to rebut the pleadings and evidence of complainant rather opted to be proceeded against exparte. It is proved on record that op no.1 received the amounts from complainant on behalf of op no.2, so op no.2 is liable to refund the amount to the complainant. There is nothing on file to disbelieve the version of complainant and that she is not entitled to the claimed maturity amount of Rs.1,68,200/- from op no.2. Non payment of amount of complainant clearly amounts to deficiency in service as well as unfair trade practice on the part of op no.2.

8.       In view of our above discussion, we allow this complaint and direct the opposite party no.2 to pay the maturity amount of Rs.1,68,200/- alongwith interest @6% per annum from the date of maturity till actual realization to the complainant. We also direct the op no.2 to further pay a sum of Rs.5000/- as composite compensation for harassment and litigation expenses to the complainant. The op no.2 is liable to comply with this order within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order, failing which complainant will be at liberty to initiate proceedings under Section 71/72 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 against the op no.2. A copy of this order be supplied to the parties free of costs.   File be consigned to record room.

 

 

Announced:                   Member      Member                President,

Dated: 06.06.2023.                                               District Consumer Disputes

                                                                        Redressal Commission, Sirsa.

JK

 

 

 
 
[ Padam Singh Thakur]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ Sukhdeep Kaur]
MEMBER
 
 
[ O.P Tuteja]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.