DIST. CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESAL COMMISSION
NORTH 24 Pgs., BARASAT.
C. C. No. 159/2018
Date of Filing: Date of Admission: Date of Disposal:
06.04.2018 17.04.2018 11.01.2023
Complainant/s:- | Sri Shyam Sundar Dhar, S/o. Late Chitta Ranjan Dhar, Vill-Balarampur, P.O. Balia, P.S. Chakdaha, Dist- Nadia, Pin741223. -Vs- |
Opposite Party/s:- | 1.Sahara India Commercial Corporation Ltd, Its regd. office at Sahara India Bhawan, 1, Kapoorthala Complex, Aliganj, Lucknow-226024. 2. Sahara India Commercial Corporation Ltd, Its Sector office at Habra Jessore Road, North 24 Parganas, Pin-743263. |
P R E S E N :- Smt. Monisha Shaw …………………. Member.
:- Sri Abhijit Basu……………………….Member
JUDGMENT / FINAL ORDER
This is a complaint U/S. 12 of C.P. Act 1986 read with Section 13 of C.P.Act, 1986.
The brief facts of the case is as under-
The complainant stated that being convinced by the representative of the O.Ps and the complainant agreed to deposit money in the ‘Sahara India Commercial Corporation Ltd. as Sahara Rajat Yojna Scheme. The complainant invested total Rs. 20,000/-.
The opposite party issued the passbook being account No.243003372263 amounting Rs.10,000/- with account No. 243003372264 amounting Rs. 10,000/- dated 01.11.2004 (Total Rs.20,000/-).
The opposite party issued said passbook certificate. But after maturity of the said scheme the complainant went to the office of the opposite parties for relating and/or collecting the matured amount but the opposite parties was neglected and refused to refund the matured amount in spite of several demands of complainant. Hence the complainant filed this case for direction to the O.P. Nos. 1 and 2 to pay the matured value of the said scheme and other reliefs.
O.P. Nos. 1 and 2 did not contest the case by filing written version after receiving the notice.
Reason for judgment
Considering the petition of the complainant, and evidence of the complainant and documents filed we find that the complainant had deposited the amount as stated by the complainant and the O.P.Nos. 1 and 2 after maturity of the said scheme failed and neglected to pay matured value. The O.P. Nos. 1 and 2 did not controvert the allegations of the complaint by filing any evidence or any oath. The complainant proved the case by swearing of affidavit which was not controverted by O.P.Nos.1 and 2, Therefore, we find that the complainant has proved the case.
Contd/-2
C. C. No. 159/2018
:: 2 ::
Hence,
it is ordered
that the case be and the same is allowed exparte against the O.Ps.
The O.P. Nos. 1,2 are directed to pay the matured value in respect of said scheme being account No.Upon production of original passbook and documents of deposit by the complainant, along with interest thereon at the rate of 6% p.a. from the date of maturity till payment of the same within two months from the date of judgment, failing which the complainant is at liberty to execute the decree according to law.
Let plain copy of this order be given to the parties free of cost as per CPR, 2005.
Dictated & Corrected by
Member
Member Member
