View 7664 Cases Against Sahara Credit Cooperative Society
View 33540 Cases Against Society
Gurmeet Singh filed a consumer case on 04 Sep 2023 against Sahara Credit Cooperative Society Ltd in the Ludhiana Consumer Court. The case no is CC/23/84 and the judgment uploaded on 11 Sep 2023.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, LUDHIANA.
Complaint No: 84 dated 01.03.2023. Date of decision: 04.09.2023.
Gurmeet Singh aged about 62 years son of Gurdiyal Singh, r/o. Patti Rau Ki, Baddowal, Tehsil and District Ludhiana-142021. (Mobile No.94636-70722) ..…Complainant
Versus
Complaint Under Section 35 of the Consumer Protection Act.
QUORUM:
SH. SANJEEV BATRA, PRESIDENT
SH. JASWINDER SINGH, MEMBER
MS. MONIKA BHAGAT, MEMBER
COUNSEL FOR THE PARTIES:
For complainant : Sh. P.S. Chawla, Advocate.
For OPs : Sh. Sandeep Kumar, Advocate (Right of the OPs to file written statement already extinguished vide order dated 14.07.2023)
ORDER
PER MONIKA BHAGAT, MEMBER
1. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the opposite parties are duly registered financial institution under Multistate Co-operative Society Act, 2002. The representative of opposite party No.1 met and apprised the complainant to invest in their plan to get benefits, upon which the complainant vide membership No.27031601106 took SAHARA G. ANOKHA plan of the opposite parties having account No.27036700216 dated 31.12.2016 for 72 months. The complainant started depositing Rs.1000/- per month from 31.12.2016 with the opposite parties and deposited only 38 installments against receipts. In the said certificate, it was mentioned that the complainant would get a maturity amount with interest after its maturity i.e. 31.12.2022. On the completion of the maturity period, the complainant approached the opposite parties to release the agreed maturity amount but they did not respond and dilly delayed the matter on one pretext or the other. Therefore, the complainant filed the present complaint asserting that the act and conduct of the opposite parties amounts to deficiency in service and further prayed for refund of the amount of Rs.38,000/- along with interest and to pay compensation to the tune of Rs.25,000/- on account of mental agony, harassment and distress. The complainant also claimed litigation expenses of Rs.11,000/-.
2. Upon notice, Sh. Sandeep Kumar, Advocate appeared and filed power of attorney on behalf of the opposite parties but thereafter, failed to file written statement affidavit and documents despite grant of sufficient opportunity and as such, the right of the opposite parties to file written statement already extinguished vide order dated 14.07.2023
3. In evidence, the complainant tendered his affidavit as Ex. CA and reiterated his averments of the complaint. The complainant also placed on record copies of receipts Ex. C1, Ex. C3 to Ex. C39 and copy of passbook/account No.27036700216 as Ex. C2 issued by the opposite parties and closed the evidence.
4. We have heard the counsel for the complainant and also gone through the complaint, affidavit and documents annexed by the complainant.
5. In his affidavit Ex. CA, the complainant has reiterated the entire case as set forth in the complaint. The complainant has further proved on record the copy of receipt Ex. C3 to Ex. C39 of Rs.1,000/- each issued by the opposite parties. Though the evidence has gone unrebutted on the file, the receipts Ex. C3 to Ex. C39 reveal that the complainant deposited Rs.1,000/- each i.e. total Rs.37,000/- with the opposite parties. However, amount of maturity and date of maturity is not printed in Ex. C3 to Ex. C39. In these circumstances, it would be just and proper if the opposite parties are directed to refund the amount of Rs.37,000/- along with interest @8% from 14.02.2020 till date of actual payment along with composite costs of Rs.10,000/-.
6. As a result of above discussion, the complaint is partly allowed with an order that the opposite parties shall be jointly and severally liable to refund the amount of Rs.37,000/- along with interest @8% from 14.02.2020 to the complainant within 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of order. The opposite parties shall further pay a composite compensation of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) to the complainant. Compliance of order be made within 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of the order. Copies of order be supplied to parties free of costs as per rules. File be indexed and consigned to record room.
(Monika Bhagat) (Jaswinder Singh) (Sanjeev Batra) Member Member President
Announced in Open Commission.
Dated:04.09.2023.
Gobind Ram.
Gurmeet Singh Vs Sahara Credit Cooperative Society CC/23/84
Present: Sh. P.S. Chawla, Advocate for complainant.
Sh. Sandeep Kumar, Advocate for OPs. (Right of the OPs to file written statement already extinguished vide order dated 14.07.2023)
Learned counsel for the complainant closed evidence after tendering affidavit Ex. CA along with documents Ex. C1 to Ex. C39.
Arguments heard. Vide separate detailed order of today, the complaint is partly allowed with an order that the opposite parties shall be jointly and severally liable to refund the amount of Rs.37,000/- along with interest @8% from 14.02.2020 to the complainant within 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of order. The opposite parties shall further pay a composite compensation of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) to the complainant. Compliance of order be made within 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of the order. Copies of order be supplied to parties free of costs as per rules. File be indexed and consigned to record room.
(Monika Bhagat) (Jaswinder Singh) (Sanjeev Batra) Member Member President
Announced in Open Commission.
Dated:04.09.2023.
Gobind Ram.
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.