Haryana

Panipat

CC/164/2023

Nasima - Complainant(s)

Versus

Sahara Credit Cooperative Society Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Shri Vijay Singh Malik

28 Oct 2024

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
PANIPAT
 
Complaint Case No. CC/164/2023
( Date of Filing : 12 May 2023 )
 
1. Nasima
Wife of Kamaldeen S/o Sh. Prem Singh, R/o VPO Ugrakheri, Tehsil and Distt. Panipat. Age 39 years.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Sahara Credit Cooperative Society Ltd.
Sahara India Bhawan, 1, Kapurthala Complex, Aliganj, Lucknow- 226024, through its Chairman.
2. Mr. Puli Ramarao V.
Managing Director, Sahara Credit Cooperative Society Ltd., Sahara India Bhawan, 1, Kapurthala Complex, Aliganj Lucknow - 226024.
3. Sahara Credit Cooperative Society Ltd.
Branch office Adjoining Global Hospital, Near Sarson Ke Tel Ka Kohlu, Across Shiv Chowk, Subzi Mandi, Sanoli Road, Panipat, through its Branch Manager Sohm Lal.
4. Sandeep Kumar Saini
S/o Sh. Jagdish Saini, VPO Ugrakheri, Tehsil and Distt. Panipat.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  Dr. R. K. Dogra PRESIDENT
  Dr. Rekha Chaudhary MEMBER
  Mr. Vinit Kaushik MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
Shri Vijay Singh Malik, Advocate for complainant.
......for the Complainant
 
Opposite parties No.1 to 4 already ex parte vide order dated 26.07.2023.
......for the Opp. Party
Dated : 28 Oct 2024
Final Order / Judgement

                    No evidence of complainant is present. A date is requested on behalf of the complainant, which is opposed. Heard. This case is continuing for evidence of the complainant from 26.07.2023 and today is last opportunity on payment of costs Rs.500/-. Even cost has not been paid by the complainant and no efforts has been made by the complainant to produce the evidence. Moreso, the complainant has already availed seven effective opportunities including three last opportunities. Hence, there are no sufficient grounds for adjourning this case for the purpose of the evidence of the complainant. Hence, the evidence of the complainant is hereby closed by order of this Commission.

 2.               Notice was sent to the opposite parties No.1 to 4 but none was appeared on behalf of opposite parties No.1 to 4, hence the opposite parties No.1 to 4 were proceeded ex parte vide order dated 26.07.2023.

3.                As the complainant has come before this Commission for seeking relief, the onus was on the complainant to prove his case by adducing cogent and convincing evidence. Since the complainant has not produced any evidence on record despite several effective opportunities as stated above and hence, there is no iota of evidence on record to substantiate the allegations of the complaint. Hence, the present complaint is hereby dismissed in lacking of evidence. However, both the parties are left to bear their own costs.

4.                This order be communicated to the parties free of costs and file be consigned to the record-room.

 
 
[ Dr. R. K. Dogra]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ Dr. Rekha Chaudhary]
MEMBER
 
 
[ Mr. Vinit Kaushik]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.