Haryana

Sirsa

CC/22/599

Seema Bhutani - Complainant(s)

Versus

Sahara Credit Cooperative Soc - Opp.Party(s)

Rajeev Sharma

04 Aug 2023

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. CC/22/599
( Date of Filing : 22 Sep 2022 )
 
1. Seema Bhutani
Resident Sirsa
Sirsa
Haryana
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Sahara Credit Cooperative Soc
BM Sirsa
Sirsa
Haryana
2. Sahara Credit Cooperative Soc
Office At Sahara India Bhawan 1 kapoorthla Complex Aliganj Lucknow
Lucknow
UP
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  Padam Singh Thakur PRESIDENT
  Sukhdeep Kaur MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Rajeev Sharma, Advocate for the Complainant 1
 
Dated : 04 Aug 2023
Final Order / Judgement

BEFORE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SIRSA.

                                                          Complaint Case no. 599 of 2022      

                                                          Date of Institution: 22.09.2022

                                                          Date of Decision:   04.08.2023. 

           

Smt. Seema Bhutani wife of Narender Kumar, resident of Sirsa, Tehsil and Distt. Sirsa.

                                                                             ………Complainant.

                                      Versus

 

1. Sahara Credit Cooperative Society Limited, through its Branch Manager Sirsa, Distt. Sirsa.

 

2. Sahara Credit Cooperative Society Limited., Regd Office, Sahara India Bhawan, 1, Kapoorthala Complex, Aliganj, Lucknow- 226024 through its Managing Director/ Prop. / Auth. Person.

                     ……… Opposite parties.

 

          Complaint under Section 35 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

 

Before:       SH. PADAM SINGH THAKUR………. PRESIDENT

           SMT. SUKHDEEP KAUR……………..MEMBER                                         

Present:         Sh. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate for complainant.

Opposite parties exparte.

                  

ORDER:-

 

          This complaint has been filed by complainant against the opposite parties seeking payment of Rs.96,112/- as maturity amount alongwith interest besides compensation for harassment and litigation expenses from ops.

2.       In brief, the case of complainant is that complainant had purchased a fix deposit policy vide certificate No. 787002150133 account number 24847201082 for the amount of Rs.82,077/- on 11.08.2018, Hologram No. 992731703979 for the period of 18 months from the ops and said FDR was to be matured on 11.02.2020. On maturity, the ops were liable to pay an amount of Rs.96,112/- to the complainant. It is further averred that after maturity of said FDR on 11.02.2020, the ops have failed to make payment of the maturity amount to the complainant despite her several requests and visits and have caused unnecessary harassment and mental agony. Hence, this complaint.

3        On notice, op no.1 failed to appear despite service and as such op no.1 was proceeded against exparte. Op no.2 also failed to appear despite delivery of notice sent through registered cover and as such op no.2 was also proceeded against exparte.

4.       The complainant in evidence has tendered her affidavit Ex.CW1/A and copy of receipt/ certificate Ex. C1. 

5.       We have heard learned counsel for complainant and have gone through the case file carefully.

6.       From the copy of receipt/ certificate Ex. C1, it is evident that on 11.08.2018 complainant deposited amount of Rs.82,077/- with the ops and on maturity on 11.02.2020 she was entitled to receive maturity amount of Rs. 96,112/- from ops. According to the complainant after maturity, the ops have failed to refund the maturity amount to the complainant. The ops despite issuance of notices have failed to appear and opted to be proceeded against exparte. Therefore, the pleadings and evidence of complainant remained unchallenged and unrebutted. There is nothing on file to disbelieve the version of complainant and that she is not entitled to the maturity amount of Rs.96,112/- from ops. Non payment of amount of complainant clearly amounts to deficiency in service as well as unfair trade practice on the part of ops.

7.       In view of our above discussion, we allow this complaint and direct the opposite parties to pay the amount of Rs.96,112/- alongwith interest @6% per annum from the date of maturity till actual realization to the complainant. We also direct the ops to further pay a sum of Rs.5000/- as composite compensation for harassment and litigation expenses to the complainant. The ops are liable to comply with this order within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order, failing which complainant will be at liberty to initiate proceedings under Section 71/72 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 against the ops. A copy of this order be supplied to the parties free of costs.   File be consigned to record room.

 

 

Announced:                             Member                              President,

Dated: 04.08.2023.                                               District Consumer Disputes

                                                                                 Redressal Commission, Sirsa.

 

JK

 
 
[ Padam Singh Thakur]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ Sukhdeep Kaur]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.