DIST. CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESAL COMMISSION
NORTH 24 Pgs., BARASAT.
C. C. No. 166/2018
Date of Filing: Date of Admission: Date of Disposal:
06.04.2020 20.04.2018 11.01.2023
Complainant/s:- | Sri Ranjan Saha, S/o. Ramen Saha, Vill- Natunpally, P.O. Maslandpur, P.S.Habra, Dist- North 24 Parganas, Pin-743289. -Vs- |
Opposite Party/s:- | 1.Sahara Credit Cooperative Society Ltd, Its regd. office at Sahara India Bhawan, 1, Kapoorthala Complex, Aliganj, Lucknow-226024. 2. Sahara Credit Co-operative Society Ltd, Its Sector office at Habra, North 24 Parganas, Pin-743263. |
P R E S E N :- Smt. Monisha Shaw …………………. Member.
:- Sri Abhijit Basu……………………….Member
JUDGMENT / FINAL ORDER
This case is a complaint U/S. 12 of C.P. Act 1986 read with Section 13of C.P.Act, 1986.
The brief facts of the case is as under-
The complainant stated that being convinced by the representative of the O.Ps, the complainant agreed to deposit money in the ‘Sahara Credit Cooperative Society Ltd as Sahara minor Savings Scheme and /or daily savings. The complainant deposited / invested Rs. 26,400/- …………….
The opposite party No.2 issued the passbook being account No 16323708386 on 28.12.2011.
The opposite party issued said passbook and the complainant went to the office of the opposite parties for realizing and / or collecting for legitimate demand but the opposite parties was neglected and refused to refund the legitimate demand and / or matured amount in spite of several demands by the complainant. Hence the complainant filed this case for direction to the O.P. Nos. 1 and 2 to pay the matured value of the said scheme and other reliefs.
O.P.Nos. 1,2 did not contest the case by filing written version after receiving the notice.
Reason for judgment
Considering the petition of the complainant, and evidence of the complainant and documents filed we find that the complainant had deposited the amount as stated by the complainant and the O.P.Nos. 1 and 2 after maturity of the scheme failed and neglected to pay matured value. The O.P. Nos. 1 and 2 did not controvert the allegations of the complaint by filing any evidence or any oath. The complainant proved the case by swearing of affidavit which was not controverted by O.Ps. Therefore, we find that the complainant has proved the case and is entitled to get the decree against O.P. Nos. 1 and 2.
Hence,
it is ordered
that the case be and the same is allowed exparte against the O.Ps.
The O.P. Nos. 1,2 are directed to pay the deposited amount with assured interest of that amount in respect of the said scheme being account No 16323708386 dated 28.12.2011.
Contd/-2
C. C. No. 166/2018
:: 2 ::
Upon production of original passbook and documents of deposit by the complainant, along with interest thereon at the rate of 6% p.a. from the date of maturity till payment of the same within two months from the date of judgment, failing which the complainant is at liberty to execute a decree according to law.
Let plain copy of this order be given to the parties free of cost as per CPR, 2005.
Dictated & Corrected by
Member
Member Member
