West Bengal

Kolkata-II(Central)

CC/327/2022

Neelam Tolasaria - Complainant(s)

Versus

Sahara Credit Co operative Society Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Somnath Giri

02 Aug 2023

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
KOLKATA UNIT - II (CENTRAL)
8-B, NELLIE SENGUPTA SARANI, 7TH FLOOR,
KOLKATA-700087.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/327/2022
( Date of Filing : 08 Sep 2022 )
 
1. Neelam Tolasaria
191 Bangur Avenue, Block C, 3rd Floor, P.S. Lake Town, Kolkata-700055.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Sahara Credit Co operative Society Ltd.
Sahara India Sadan, 2A, Shakespeare Sarani, Kolkata-700017.
2. Sahara Credit Co operative Society Ltd.
Sahara India Bhawan, 1, Kapoorthala Complex, Aligang, Lucknow-226024.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. Sukla Sengupta PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Sahana Ahmed Basu MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Reyazuddin Khan MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Somnath Giri, Advocate for the Complainant 1
 
Dated : 02 Aug 2023
Final Order / Judgement

FINAL ORDER/JUDGEMENT

 

 

Smt. SAHANA AHMED BASU, Member,

 

Brief facts of the case, are that, the Complainant had invested Rs.40,000/- with OPs as on 29/06/2012 against Certificate No.351004913634, Rs.40,000/- against  Certificate No.351004913636 and on 09/07/2012 Rs.5,500/- against the Certificate No.351004913700. Date of maturity of those certificates was 29/06/2020 and 09/07/2020 and maturity amounts are Rs.1,04,480/-, Rs.1,04,480/- and Rs.14,366/-. Despite maturity the OPs did not refund the maturity amount of those certificates. Finding no other alternative, Complainant sent la Legal Notice dated 09.11.2020 to the OP-1  speed post and to OP2 by hand demanding maturity amount but the OPs did not response such demand letter. There is deficiency in service and unfair trade practice on the part of the OPs. Hence, the consumer complaint.

 

            OPs despite service of notice of the complaint have failed to file written version within the limitation provided u/s 38(2) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019. No request for condonation of delay or extension of time for filing written version is made. Therefore, right of the OPs to file W.V is closed and the case has proceeded ex parte against the OPs.

 

 

 

Complainant has filed his evidence by way of affidavit supporting the allegations made in the complaint.

 

            Ld. Advocate for the complainant has taken us through the Consumer Complaint as also the evidence adduced of the complainant. On perusal of photocopies of Certificates dated 29/06/2012 and 09/07/2012 issued by the OP-1 to the Complainant it is clear that vide those certificates Complainant had invested Rs.85,500/- in total with OPs under Sahara .E. SHINE Scheme. It is also clear from those Certificates that OPs had agreed to refund the investment amount with maturity amount of Rs.2,08,960/- and Rs.14,366within 96 months from the date of issue i.e. on 29/06/2020 and 09/07/2020. Complainant has categorically alleged that despite maturity, OPs have failed to refund the investment amount coupled with interest. As the OPs have opted not to file written version despite service of notice of complaint, the above allegations of the complainant is deemed to have been admitted as correct.

 

OPs are fully aware that they are liable to pay the matured amount of Rs.2,08,960/-  and Rs.14,366/- under Sahara .E. SHINE Scheme to the complainant after 96 months. Complainant invested his hard earned money with the OPs. The OPs deliberately make their illegal gains and to deprive the complainant from his lawful right. Thus, the OPs have adopted unfair trade practice, and in fact, withhold the invested  amount of Rs.85,500/- in spite of its maturity which no doubt adopted deceitful manner of trade. Complainant cannot wait indefinitely to get matured amount. Complainant has suffered mental agony, pain and harassment. To get the relief, complainant has to wage a long drawn and tedious legal battle.

 

In view of the foregoing discussion, we are of the view that Complainant is entitled to refund the matured amount of  Sahara E. SHINE Scheme along with compensation and litigation cost.

 

Thus, the consumer complaint is allowed with following directions:-

 

  1. OPs are jointly and severally directed to refund the maturity amount of Rs.2,23,326/- (104480+104480+14366) to the Complainant within 60 days from today.

 

  1. OPs are also jointly and severally directed to pay Rs.10,000/- only as compensation for mental agony, pain and harassment to the Complainant within the stipulated period.

 

  1. OPs are further jointly and severally directed to pay a sum of Rs.5,000/- as cost of litigation to the Complainant within the stipulated period.

 

With these directions the present Consumer Complaint stands disposed of.

 

Copy of the Judgment be given to the parties as per rules.

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Sukla Sengupta]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Sahana Ahmed Basu]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Reyazuddin Khan]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.