West Bengal

StateCommission

FA/281/2009

Arunava Sengupta. - Complainant(s)

Versus

Sahara Air Lines Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. Jayanta Ranjan Das.

10 Aug 2009

ORDER


STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION , WEST BENGAL
BHAWANI BHAWAN (Gr. Floor), 31 Belvedere Road. Kolkata -700027
APPEAL No. FA/281/2009 of 2009
(Arisen out of Order Dated 30/06/2009 of Case No. 51/2006 of District Kolkata Unit-1)

1. Arunava Sengupta.
2. Mrs. Krishna Sengupta (wife).
3. Mrs. Sreya Sengupta.
4. Asit Ghosh.
5. Mrs. Barnali Ghosh. (wife) 		...........Appellant(s)

Vs.

1. Sahara Air Lines Ltd.
2. Sahara Airlines Ltd.
3. Royal Avianca Air Trade & Tour. 		...........Respondent(s)


BEFORE:
1. MR. A K RAY 2. SMT. SILPI MAJUMDER

For the Appellant :
Mr. Jayanta Ranjan Das., Advocate

For the Respondent :




ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

No. 1/10.08.2009.

SRI A. K. RAY, MEMBER.

Heard Mr. Jayanta Ranjan Das, the Ld. Advocate for the Appellants.  It appears that the final order was passed by the Forum below on 30.08.2009 and thereafter the party in question slept for about two years to come up with a put up petition before the Forum below for modification of its final order.  The Forum below rightly rejected the same.  Thereafter this appeal petition has been filed before us.  We apprehend that the Appellants have not come to us with a clean hand.  The put up petition was filed before the Forum only to avoid the passage of time.  In the circumstances being satisfied that the Appellants did not come to us with a clean hand and they had also approached the Forum below with the said put up petition only to bridge up the inordinate and huge gap of time, we are not inclined to accept the instant memo of appeal.  The same is, therefore, summarily rejected.




......................MR. A K RAY
......................SMT. SILPI MAJUMDER