West Bengal

StateCommission

A/232/2022

Discovery of India - Complainant(s)

Versus

Sadhan Kumar Mandal - Opp.Party(s)

Mahadeb Mukherjee, Pampa Dey

14 Jul 2023

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
WEST BENGAL
11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087
 
First Appeal No. A/232/2022
( Date of Filing : 12 Sep 2022 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 16/06/2022 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/34/2022 of District Kolkata-I(North))
 
1. Discovery of India
2, India Exchange Place, UCO Bank Building, 1st Floor, Room No.- 16, Near Calcutta Stock Exchange, Kolkata- 700 001
2. Sri Prodip Das, Chief Executive, Discovery of India
S2, India Exchange Place, UCO Bank Building, 1st Floor, Room No.- 16, Near Calcutta Stock Exchange, Kolkata- 700 001.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Sadhan Kumar Mandal
55, Canal Side Road, Barhans, Garia, P.S.- Narendrapur, Kolkata- 700 084.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. AJEYA MATILAL PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. SOMA BHATTACHARJEE MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Mahadeb Mukherjee, Pampa Dey, Advocate for the Appellant 1
 Mr Sumit Biswas, Rajashree Bhowmick, Advocate for the Respondent 1
Dated : 14 Jul 2023
Final Order / Judgement

Hon’ble Mr. Ajeya Matilal, Presiding Member

          Both parties are present through their Ld. Advocates.

          Due to inadvertence today is fixed for hearing of IA/969/2022. But it appears from order no. 4 dt. 12.04.2023 that the aforesaid IA was allowed subject to payment of cost of Rs. 2000/- payable to SCWF. The receipt of payment of cost has been filed by the appellant. Copy of the receipt be kept with the record.

          Admit the appeal.

          Heard the Ld. Advocates for both sides.

          Considered.

          In the instant appeal the OP/ appellant prayed for setting aside the impugned order dt. 16.06.2022 passed by Ld. DCDRC Unit- I along with CC/34/2022 directing the OPs jointly and severally to pay Rs. 1,20,000/- along with compensation of Rs. 20,000/- and litigation cost of Rs. 10,000/-. The Ld. Advocate for the appellant submitted that he was not present at the time of hearing  so an opportunity should be given to him by this appellant forum.

          But the Ld. Advocate for the respondent submitted that the appellant / OP wilfully avoided to appear before the Forum below.

          However it appears that the OP/ appellant could not contest the case. So, we are of the view that an opportunity should be given to the OP concerned to contest the case subject to payment of cost.

          Accordingly A/232/2022 is allowed on contest subject to payment of cost of Rs. 4000/- payable to the respondent. The impugned order is set aside. Parties are directed to appear before the forum below by 14.08.2023 and the appellant /OP shall file W.V before the Ld. Commission below on that date positively.

          The Ld. Forum below is requested to dispose of the case within 2 months from 14.08.2023 after giving opportunity to both parties of being heard without being influenced by any observation made by this Commission.

          Order of stay, if any, in connection with the present appeal stands vacated.

          Let a copy of this order be sent to the Ld. DCDRC, Unit I.

          Joint Registrar of this Commission is directed to do the needful in this regard.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. AJEYA MATILAL]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. SOMA BHATTACHARJEE]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.