Haryana

Rohtak

CC/21/509

Vinod/Manoj - Complainant(s)

Versus

Sachin Battery House - Opp.Party(s)

Sh. Ashok Sehgal

06 Oct 2021

ORDER

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.
Haryana.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/21/509
( Date of Filing : 03 Sep 2021 )
 
1. Vinod/Manoj
S/o Sh. Som Nath r/o Babra Mohalla Rohtak now r/o House No. 523/8 Brahmanan Mandi near Patwar Khana Rohtak.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Sachin Battery House
Jhajjar Road behind HUDA Park Rohtak through its Prop.
2. Shri Krishna Electronics,
Shop no.4 Chhotu Ram Park, Civil Road Rohtak.
3. Sparco Batteries Private Limited (Altima Battery)
A-35/1 Maya Puri Industrial Area Phase I New Delhi-65 through its Managing Director.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Nagender Singh Kadian PRESIDENT
  Mrs. Tripti Pannu MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 06 Oct 2021
Final Order / Judgement

Before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rohtak.

 

                                                                        Complaint No. : 509.

                                                                        Instituted on     :  3.9.2021.    

                                                                        Decided on       :  6.10.2021.  

 

Vinod alias Manoj son of Sh. Som Nath, resident of Babra Mohalla Rohtak now R/o House No.523/8 Brahmanan Mandi, near Patwar Khana, Rohtak.                                                                                                                                                    ………..Complainant.

                                                Vs.

  1. Sachin Battery House, Jhajjar Road behind HUDA Park Rohtak through its Prop.
  2. Shri Krishna Electronics, Shop no.4, Chhotu Ram Park, Civil Road, Rohtak.
  3. Sparco Batteries Private Limited (Altima Battery) A-35/1 Maya Puri Industrial Area Phase I New Delhi-64, through its Managing Director.

                                                                                    ……….Opposite parties.

 

Present:           Complainant in person with Sh. Ashok Sehgal, Advocate.

Sh. Rajnish Kumar Proprietor of Sachin Battery House for opposite party no.1.

Sh. Neeraj Sharma appeared on behalf of OP no.2.

Sh. Shambhu Pal, ASM of Sparco Batteries for OP No.3.

 

                        File taken up today on an application moved by ld. Counsel for the complainant.  Complainant alongwith OPs no.1 to 3 made a joint statement to the effect that the matter has been compromised between the parties and complainant received new battery no.AL65T-BT21J04-00583 from the opposite parties and has handed over old battery to the opposite parties. Opposite parties received the old battery from the complainant, so complainant withdraws the present complaint being fully satisfied.

            In view of the above statement, the present complaint is hereby dismissed as withdrawn being fully satisfied. Copy of this order be supplied to the parties free of cost.

                        File be consigned to the record after due compliance.

Dated : 6.10.2021

 

Member                                                                       President

                                                                                                            DCDRC, Rohtak

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Nagender Singh Kadian]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ Mrs. Tripti Pannu]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.