Kerala

StateCommission

A/08/207

Managing Director - Complainant(s)

Versus

Sabeel Subair - Opp.Party(s)

G.S.Rajeev

03 Oct 2008

ORDER


.
CDRC, Sisuvihar Lane, Sasthamangalam.P.O, Trivandrum-10
Appeal(A) No. A/08/207

Managing Director
...........Appellant(s)

Vs.

Sabeel Subair
...........Respondent(s)


BEFORE:
1. JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU 2. SMT.VALSALA SARNGADHARAN

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):
1. Managing Director

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):
1. Sabeel Subair

For the Appellant :
1. G.S.Rajeev

For the Respondent :
1.



ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

 

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
                    VAZHUTHACADU THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
 
           APPEAL:207/2008
 
                             JUDGMENT DATED.3..10..2008
 
PRESENT
 
JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU                   : PRESIDENT
 
SMT.VALSALA SARANGADHARAN                 : MEMBER
 
Managing Director,
Suhail Man Power Consultants,
Mas Tower, Attakulangara                                     : APPELLANT
Near Subjail, Thiruvananthapuram.
 
(By Adv: Sri.G.S.Rajeev)
 
          V.
Sabeel Subair, Poovakadu Veedu,
Kappil.P.O, Edava, Thiruvanathapuram.                 : RESPONDENT
 
                                    JUDGMENT
 
JUSTICE SHRI.K.R. UDAYABHANU : PRESIDENT
 
The appellant is the opposite party who is under orders to pay a sum of Rs.15,000/- to the complainant with interest at 9% from 28..2..2003, the date of filing of the complaint and also to pay cost of Rs.1000/-.
2. It is the case of the complainant that the opposite parties agreed to provide him a job as a security personnel in Kuwait and a sum of Rs.15,000/- was demanded towards the air ticket charges. The amount was
 
 
paid and receipt was obtained on 28..2..2003.   Subsequently the opposite party collected the passport saying that the visa is ready. But the visa was not given and the amount was not repaid and the passport was not returned.
3. According to the opposite party the passport and a sum of Rs.14,000/- was returned. But visa could not be used as the passport was not handed over in time. There was dispute with respect to Rs.1000/- retained as service charges.
 4. The evidence adduced consisted of the proof affidavit of the complainant and Exts.P1 to P3.
5. The Forum has found that the receipt of Rs.15,000/- has been admitted by the opposite party. But the return of the sum of R.14,000/- as contended by the opposite party has not been established in the absence of any evidence adduced. The OP is of the year 2003. The matter has been disposed of on 15..7..2008. There was sufficient time for the appellant to adduce evidence. There is no merit in the contention that the matter should be remitted back to the Forum.
 
 
 
In the circumstances we find that there is no illegality in the order of the Forum. There is no scope for admission. Appeal is dismissed in-limine.
 
JUSTICE K.R.UDAYABHAN : PRESIDENT
 
 
VALSALA SARANGADHARAN: MEMBER
 
 
VL.



......................JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU
......................SMT.VALSALA SARNGADHARAN