Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/340/2017

The Manager - Complainant(s)

Versus

S.Thangaraj - Opp.Party(s)

S.Munuvelu

29 Nov 2022

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
First Appeal No. A/340/2017
( Date of Filing : 08 Dec 2017 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )
 
1. The Manager
1st Floor , Montieth Road, Egmore, Chennai600 008
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. S.Thangaraj
144/1, T.H.Road, M.R Nagar, Chennai 600 118
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. R.VENKATESAPERUMAL MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 29 Nov 2022
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

                BEFORE   Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE. R. SUBBIAH                  ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                      Thiru.R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                ::      MEMBER

 

FA. No. 340/2017

  (Against the order in C.C. No.112/2015,dated 28.4.2016 on the file of the DCDRC, Chennai(North)

                                                               DATED THIS THE 29th   DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021

 

 

The Manager,

S.P.Cell Tech,

Shop 8, Lision Complex,

1st Floor, Montieth Road,

Egmore, Chennai 600 008                             ..Appellant/opposite party

 

                                       Vs

 

S.Thangaraj,

S/o Subramani,

No.144/1, T.H.Road,

M.R.Nagar, Chennai 600 118                       ..Respondent/complainant

 

Counsel for the Appellant/opposite party                   : M/s S.Manivelu

Counsel for the Respondent/complainant                   : M/s P.Ravichandran

 

 

          This appeal is coming on before us for hearing today, this commission made thefollowing order in open court :-

 

                                              Docket order

 

          No representation for both parties. This appeal is posted today for appearance of both and for arguments in list or for dismissal. When the matter was called at 11.00 A.M, the appellant was not present hence, passed over and called again at 12.30 noon, then also the appellant has not appeared. Hence we are of the view that keeping the appeal pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case. Hence the appeal is dismissed for default. No order as to cost.

 

      Sd/-                                                                                                              Sd/-

R VENKATESA PERUMAL                                                                       R. SUBBIAH             

          MEMBER                                                                                          PRESIDENT

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. R.VENKATESAPERUMAL]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.