West Bengal

Murshidabad

CC/136/2013

Jahangir Biswas - Complainant(s)

Versus

S.S S.M. Domkal Group Electric Supply Office Domkal C.C.C. - Opp.Party(s)

09 Apr 2015

ORDER

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum
Berhampore, Murshidabad.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/136/2013
 
1. Jahangir Biswas
S/O- Emran Biswas, Vill- Chandpur, Jitpur Pardiar, P.O.- Jitpur, P.S.- Domkal, Dist- Murshidabad
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. S.S S.M. Domkal Group Electric Supply Office Domkal C.C.C.
W.B.S.E.D.C.L Domkal, P.S.- Domkal, Dist- Murshidabad.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. SAMORESH KUMAR MITRA PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. PRANATI ALI MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

IN THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,

MURSHIDABAD AT BERHAMPORE.

CASE No.  CC-136/2013 .

 Date of Filing: 02.12.2013.                                                                                                                      Date of Final Order: 09.04 .2015.

 

Complainant:  Jahangir Biswas, S/O- Emran Biswas  Vill. Chandpur(Jitpur), Pardiar, P.O.- Jitpur

                        P.S. -Domkal, Dist.- Murshidabad.

-Vs-

Opposite Party: S.S. & S.M. Domkal Group Electric Supply, Office Domkal CCC, WBSEDCL,

                           P.O. -Domkal, P.S. -Domkal, Dist.- Murshidabad.

                                                                                     

                       Present:  Sri Samaresh Kumar Mitra ………………………Member.           

                                                                        Smt. Pranati Ali ……….……………….……………. Member

 

FINAL ORDER

 

Samaresh Kumar Mitra, Member

 

This complaint has been filed by the complainant u/s 12 of C. P. Act, 1986 with a prayer for getting Electric Connection in his residential house.

The OP-Domkal CCC, WBSEDCL appeared in this case by filing written Version to contest the case.

Today is fixed for filing show-cause by the complainant as to why the complaint should not be dismissed due non-prosecution. The complainant is found absent.

From the case record, it appears that the previously complainant did not take steps on consecutive several dates. As a result, by order No.14. dt. 03.03.15 the complainant was directed fixing 09.04.15 to show cause as to why the case should not be dismissed due non-prosecution. On that date neither the complainant himself nor his agent was found to be present in spite of getting sufficient opportunities to argue his case.

 

 In this situation, we are of considered opinion that the Complainant is not interested to proceed with the case and as such the Consumer Complaint No. 136/2013 be and the same is dismissed due to non-prosecution.            

                                  

     Let a plain copy of this order be made available and be supplied free of cost, to each of the parties on contest in person, Ld. Advocate/Agent on record, by hand under proper acknowledgment  to the concerned parties as per rules, for information and necessary action.

 

 

 

                Member                                                                          President-in-charge.

   District Consumer Disputes                                                  District Consumer Disputes

Redressal Forum. Murshidabad                                             Redressal Forum.Murshidabad.                                                                                                 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. SAMORESH KUMAR MITRA]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MRS. PRANATI ALI]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.