Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

FA/54/2014

K. MUTHUSAMY - Complainant(s)

Versus

S.M. GOVINDASAMY - Opp.Party(s)

M. PALANI

19 Apr 2022

ORDER

 

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

                                         BEFORE    Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE  R. SUBBIAH           ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                                              Thiru.R.VENKATESA PERUMAL                     ::      MEMBER

 

 FA. No. 54/2014

(Against the order in C.C. No.8/2013, dated 20.12.2013, on the file of

District Consumer Forum, Erode)

 

                                                                   DATED THE 19^th  DAY OF APRIL 2022

 

K.Muthusamy

S/o Karuppasamy,

5/824, Kalinarayanpalayam Pudur,

Mettunesuvampalayam,

Bhavani Post,

Erode District                                          .. Appellant/ 1^st opposite party

                                         Vs

1.S.M.Govindasamy,

S/o Muthusamy Gounder,

Public Health Development Centre,

R.NB.Pudur P.O.

Erode District                                          ..1^st Respondent/complainant

 

2. District Collector,

O/o District Collector,

Theeranchinnamalai Maligai,

Erode town Highways Road,

Erode District                                           ..2^nd Respondent/2^nd  opposite party

 

3. Regional Transport Officer,

Kollukadu Medu,

Lakkapuram P.O,

Erode District                                         ..3^rd Respondent/3^rd opposite party

 

Counsel for the Appellant/3^rd opposite party      : M/s M.Palani

Counsel for the 1^st Respondent/complainant      : M/s P.Kumaravel

Counsel for the R2 and R3 /ops 1 and 2            : M/s T.Ravikumar

 

          This appeal is coming on today for appearance of appellant and R1 and for arguments in list or for dismissal, this commission made the following order in open court :-

                                              

                                                  Docket order

          No representation for appellant. Respondents 1 to 3 present. This appeal is posted today for appearance of appellant and R1 and for arguments in list or for dismissal. When the matter was called at 11.00 A.M, the appellant was not present hence, passed over and called again at 12.30 noon, then also the appellant has not appeared. Hence we are of the view that keeping the appeal pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case. The appeal is dismissed for default. No order as to cost.

 

Sd/-                                                                                                              Sd/-

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                R.SUBBIAH

MEMBER                                                                                              PRESIDENT