A.P.Sathya Murthy filed a consumer case on 21 Sep 2017 against S.kapur & Company in the South Chennai Consumer Court. The case no is CC/347/2016 and the judgment uploaded on 13 Nov 2017.
Date of Filing : 19.09.2016
Date of Order : 21.09.2017
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI (SOUTH)
2nd Floor, Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C. Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-3
PRESENT: THIRU. M.MONY, B.Sc., L.L.B. M.L., : PRESIDENT
DR. T.PAUL RAJASEKARAN, M.A ,D.Min.PGDHRDI, AIII,BCS : MEMBER II
C.C.NO.347/2016
THURSDAY THIS 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2017
A.P. Sathya Murthy,
No.27/191, V.V. Koil Street,
Thiruvalleeswarar Nagar,
Thirumangalam,
Chennai 600 040. .. Complainant
..Vs..
M/s. S.Kapur & Company,
Rep. by Suptar Mohan Singh,
NO.20, General Patters Road,
Mount Road,
Chennai 600 002. .. Opposite party.
Counsel for Complainant : M/s.N. Anandan & another
Counsel for opposite party : Exparte.
ORDER
THIRU. M. MONY, PRESIDENT
This complaint has been filed by the complainant against the opposite party under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986 seeking direction to pay a sum of Rs.850/- towards the car body cover with interest and also to pay a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- towards mental agony and cost of the complaint.
1. The averments of the complaint in brief are as follows:
The complainant submit that on 17.9.2015 he purchased a car body cover for his Volkswagen Polo car from the opposite party, after seeing the cover and sweet words of the opposite party that there is separate space to cover the antenna etc for a sum of Rs.850/-. On 18.9.2015 when the complainant attempted to cover the car it is not suitable for Volkswagen Polo car only suitable for Maruthi Swift car. Immediately the complainant took the car body cover to the opposite party and requested to exchange it. But the opposite party refused to give another car body car suitable for Volkswagen Polo car. Accordingly the complainant issued legal notice to the opposite party on 19.9.2015 which was refused by the opposite party. As such the act of the opposite party amounts to deficiency of service which caused mental agony and hardship to the complainant.
2. Inspite of receipt of notice the opposite party did not appear before this forum and therefore he was set exparte.
3. Though the opposite party remained exparte this Forum wants to dispose this compliant fully on merits with available materials before this forum.
4. In such circumstances, in order to prove the allegation made in the complaint the proof affidavit is filed by the complainant as his evidence, and also Ex.A1 to Ex.A3 are marked.
5. POINTS 1 & 2: -
POINTS 1& 2:
In the result, the complaint is allowed in part.The opposite party shall giveVolkswagen Polo car body cover or shall pay a sum of Rs.850/- (Rupees Eight hundred and fifty only) towards cost of the car body cover and also pay compensation of Rs.3,000/- (Rupees three thousand only) towards mental agony and cost of Rs.2,000/- (Rupees Two thousand only) to the complainant.
The aboveamounts shall be payable within six weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of this order, failing which, the said amounts shall carry interest at the rate of 9% p.a to till the date of payment.
Dictated by the President to the Assistant, taken down, transcribed and computerized by her, corrected by the President and pronounced by us in the open Forum on this the 21st day of September 2017.
MEMBER-II PRESIDENT.
Complainants” side documents:
Ex.A1- 17.9.2016 - Copy of receipt cum Ack. Card.
Ex.A2- 19.9.2015 - Copy of legal notice.
Ex.A3- - - Copy of returned RPAD cover.
Opposite party’s side document: - .. Nil..
MEMBER-II PRESIDENT.
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.