Date of Filling : 17.10.2007.
Date of Disposal : 28.11.2016.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, THIRUVALLUR - 1.
PRESENT: THIRU. S. PANDIAN, B.Sc., L.L.M., … PRESIDENT
TMT. S. SUJATHA, B.Sc., … MEMBER - I
Consumer Complaint No.09/2008
(Dated this Monday the 28th day of November 2016)
R. Loganathan,
S/o. Mr. N. S. Rathnam,
No.10/11, Type-1, Giri Nagar,
O.C.F. Estate,
Avadi,
Avadi Firka,
Poonamallee Taluk,
Thiruvallur District,
Chennai - 600 054. … Complainant.
/ Versus /
1. S. Jaganath,
Constructor,
S/o. Mr. T. S. Raghavan,
No.10/1, Somasundaram Street,
T. Nagar,
Chennai - 600 017.
2. P. Govindarajulu,
Proprietor,
S/o. (Late) Pattabi Naidu,
M/s. Subamangala Constructions,
No.1, Ellaiamman Koil Street,
Defence Colony, Muthapudupet,
I. A. F., Avadi,
Chennai - 600 055.
3. The Branch Manager,
State Bank of Hyderabad,
No.175, M. M. Complex,
Arcot Road,
Porur,
Chennai - 600 116. … Opposite parties.
Counsel for the Complainant : M/s. B. Kamarajan
Counsel for the 1st Opposite party : M/s. K. Raghupathi
Counsel for the 2nd Opposite party : M/s. M.K. Sikdar
Counsel for the 3rd Opposite party : Exparte
ORDER
This complaint is filed by the complainant U/S 12 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the 1 & 2nd opposite parties for completion of the construction work as per the agreement and to handover the physical possession of the complainant’s house and to submit the land and building approval plans, the 2nd opposite party to pay the compensation for rent which paid by the complainant to be calculated from the date after the stipulated time of 9 months from the date of construction agreement to till date, the 1, 2 & 3rd opposite parties to pay compensation of Rs.2,50,000/- for mental agony and sufferings of the complainant, the 1, 2 & 3rd opposite parties to pay Rs.2,00,000/- for their negligence, dereliction of duty and deficiency of service towards the complainant with cost Rs.5,000/-.
Complainant is called absent continuously for the past hearings that is for a long time. The Counsel for the complainant also reports, ‘No instruction’. In such circumstances, this Forum suomotto issued notice to the complainant for appearance, in the interest of justice and the same has been returned with endorsement as ‘left’. Even though, this Forum has adjourned this matter subsequent hearings but the complainant has not utilized the opportunity which clearly shows the disinterest of the complainant. Therefore, there is no justification to prolong further without any further progress. Moreover, the complainant did not turn up to file the proof affidavit as his evidence in order to prove the allegations made in the complainant.
Hence, considering all the facts and the complainant failed to appear and to prove the complaint is crystal clear.
In the result, this complaint is dismissed for default. No cost.
Sd/-**** Sd/-****
MEMBER - I PRESIDENT