Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/38/2017

Tamil Nadu Housing Board, re. by its Executive Engineer - Complainant(s)

Versus

S.G.Krishna Kumari - Opp.Party(s)

M/s. V.Yuvakumar

11 Apr 2023

ORDER

 

IN THE TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE          Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                           PRESIDENT

                      Thiru. R. VENKATESAPERUMAL                           MEMBER

 

F.A. No.38/2017

 

(Against the Order dt.04.06.2015 made in C.C. No.318/2009 on the file of

D.C.D.R.C., Chennai (South))

DATED THE 11^TH DAY OF APRIL 2023

 

Tamil Nadu Housing Board,

Mogappair Division,

Thirumangalam,

Chennai – 600 101.

 

Represented by its Executive Engineer,

and Having its Head Office at:

No.493, Anna Salai,

Nandanam,

Chennai – 600 035.                                                    .. Appellant / Opposite party.

 

-Versus-

S.G. Krishna Kumari,

Residing at:

L – 176, Anna Nagar West,

Chennai – 600 102.                                                     .. Respondent / Complainant.  

.

Counsel for Appellant / Opposite party     : M/s. Sheik Abdul Rahim

Counsel for Respondent / Complainant    : M/s. M. Vidhya

      

              This appeal coming up before us on 11.04.2023 for appearance of the respondent and for arguments (in list) and this Commission made the following Order in open court:                                                                                                

Docket Order

 

Both present.

When the matter is taken up for consideration, the Counsel for the appellant / opposite party has filed a Memo and stated that the matter has been settled between the parties and the Sale Deed was executed in favour of the respondent / complainant.  Thus, the appellant / opposite sought permission of this Commission to withdraw this appeal.

The Memo is accepted.

In view of the Memo, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.   Memo form part of the Order.  No costs.

The appellant / opposite party is entitled to the Mandatory deposit.   Hence, the Registry is directed to discharge the mandatory deposit along with accrued interest in favour of the appellant / opposite party.

 

               

                Sd/-                                                                                              Sd/-                                                                        

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                        R.SUBBIAH                        

             MEMBER                                                                                     PRESIDENT