Orissa

Jagatsinghapur

CC/412/2022

Huni Nath - Complainant(s)

Versus

S.D.O,TPCODL Tirtol - Opp.Party(s)

Mr.A.Prusty

23 Feb 2024

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION JAGATSINGHPUR
JAGATSINGHPUR
 
Complaint Case No. CC/412/2022
( Date of Filing : 20 Dec 2022 )
 
1. Huni Nath
W/o Late Purna Chandra Nath, Vill- Mahamadabad, PO- Pippalmadhab, PS- Tirtol, Dist- Jagatsinghpur
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. S.D.O,TPCODL Tirtol
Electrical Sub-Division, Tirtol
2. The Deputy Manager, Commerce
TPCODL, Elect. Sub-Div. Tirtol
3. The Junior Manager (EL), TPCODL, Elect. Section, Tirtol
.- Tirtol, Dist.- Jagatsinghpur.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. PRAVAT KUMAR PADHI PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. MADHUSMITA SWAIN MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Mr.A.Prusty, Advocate for the Complainant 1
 D.M.C. (Elect.) TPCODL, Tirtol, Advocate for the Opp. Party 1
Dated : 23 Feb 2024
Final Order / Judgement

                                                                                  C.C. No.412/2022

 

Huni Nath,

W/o. Late Purna Chandra Nath,

Vill.- Mahamadabad,

P.O.- Pippalmadhab,

P.S.- Tirtol,

Dist.- Jagatsinghpur.                                            ……………. Complainant

 

                                                                                        (Versus)

  1. The S.D.O. (Elect), TPCODL,

Electrical Sub-Division, Tirtol.

  1. The Deputy Manager, Commerce,

TPCODL, Elect. Sub-Div. Tirtol.

  1. The Junior Manager (EL),

TPCODL, Elect. Section, Tirtol,

All are At/P.O./P.S.- Tirtol,

Dist.- Jagatsinghpur. …..… Opposite parties

       

 

For Complainant………..Mr. A. Prusty, Advocate

For Opposite Parties………..D.M.C. (Elect.) TPCODL, Tirtol

 

Date of Hearing: 22.02.2024                   Date of Judgment: 23.02.2024

ORDER BY HON’BLE MEMBER- MRS. M. SWAIN:

                                                                                                  JUDGMENT

             Matter relates to Sec.126 of I.E. Act, 2003 and as per the settled principles of law as decided by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of U.P. Power Corporation Ltd., Vrs. Md. Anis Ahmed, Consumer Commission has no power to adjudicate the issue.

            But as agreed by both parties we direct that opposite parties shall deduct 40% of the bill as on date and complainant shall pay in 5 installments within 6 months and during the said period the regular bill shall also be paid. With the aforesaid observation and direction consumer complaint is disposed of. No cost. 

           Pronounced in the open Commission on this 23rd February,2024.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. PRAVAT KUMAR PADHI]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. MADHUSMITA SWAIN]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.