Haryana

Ambala

CC/15/154

Dinesh Kumar - Complainant(s)

Versus

S.D.O. UHBVNL - Opp.Party(s)

In person.

03 Jun 2016

ORDER

                                                                                                                                        CC No.154 of 2015

                                                                      Dinesh Kumar Vs. SDO UHBVNL

 

Present:          None for complainant.

                        Sh. Sarvjeet Singh, Adv. counsel for Ops.

 

                        Case called several times since morning but neither complainant nor any representative on his behalf has appeared. Let the case be taken up at 12.35 P.M. 

                                                                             Sd/-                                     Sd/-

                                                                        Member                                 President

                                                                                                                        03.06.2016.

 

Present:          None for complainant.

                        Sh. Sarvjeet Singh, Adv. counsel for Ops.

 

                        Case taken up at 12.35 P.M and called repeatedly but again neither complainant nor any representative on his behalf has put in appearance. In the interest of justice, the case be again taken up at 3.20 P.M.

                                                                          Sd/-                                         Sd/-

                                                                        Member                                 President

                                                                                                                        03.06.2016

 

Present:          None for complainant.

                        Sh. Sarvjeet Singh, Adv. counsel for Ops.

 

                        Case taken up at 3.20 P.M. and called repeatedly but this time also neither complainant nor his representative has put in appearance.  Perusal of file reveals that the case was fixed for evidence of complainant on 12.01.2016 and since then he has availed several opportunities to conclude his evidence but failed to conclude the same rather opted not to come present before the Forum wherefrom it is presumed that either the OP’s have settled the grievance of the complainant or the complainant is not interested in pursuing the complaint further more.  Hence, finding no justification in adjourning the case further, the same is dismissed in default for non-appearance of the complainant. Copies of this order be sent to parties concerned free of costs, as per rules.  File after due compliance be consigned to record room.  

Announced: 03.06.2016                        Sd/-                                       Sd/-    

                                                         Member                                 President

                                                                                                                       

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.