NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/4032/2009

SURINDER SINGH - Complainant(s)

Versus

S.D.O. (T), - Opp.Party(s)

IN PERSON

18 Jan 2010

ORDER

Date of Filing: 30 Sep 2009

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/4032/2009
(Against the Order dated 24/07/2009 in Appeal No. 860/2009 of the State Commission Punjab)
1. SURINDER SINGHS/o Sh. Harinder Singh, R/o Village Khara,Tehsil & Dist. MansaPUNJAB ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. S.D.O. (T), BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD.MansaPUNJAB2. ACCOUNTS OFFICER (TRA)Bharat Sanchar Nigam LimitedMansaPUNJAB ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. B.K. TAIMNI ,PRESIDING MEMBER
For the Appellant :NEMO
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 18 Jan 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

          Even on second call, none is present on behalf of the petitioner.

          Even on merits, I see that the prayer of the petitioner is for grant of Rs.175/- spent by him for recovery of excess amount of Rs.448/-.  Admittedly, both the lower fora have gone into this question and have rejected the contention of the petitioner for grant of Rs.175/- spent by him for recovering the amount.  Question of limitation has also been gone into by the State Commission and I am in full


-2-

agreement with the analysis of the lower fora in rejecting the contention of grant of Rs.175/-l.  No merits.  dismissed.



......................B.K. TAIMNIPRESIDING MEMBER