Ghanashyam Mishra filed a consumer case on 06 Dec 2014 against S.D.O ,Electriacl(NESCO) in the Jajapur Consumer Court. The case no is CC/41/2014 and the judgment uploaded on 30 Nov -0001.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, JAJPUR.
C.C. Case No. 41/2014.
Ghanashyam Mishra
S/O. Dukhiram Mishra
Vill./P.O. Kapila, P.S.Binjharpur,
Dist.- Jajpur. ………..complainant.
(Versus)
1. S.D.O, Electrical (NESCO) ,At/P.O/Mashara
P.S.Binjharpur, Dist.Jajpur.
2. Executive Engineer, Electrical(NESCO)
At/P.O/ Dist.-Jajpur. ……………… O.Ps.
O R D E R DT. 06.12. 2014.
The record is put up in the Second National Lok Adalat. The advocate for the complainant, the complainant and O.Ps are present.
Inflated bill is the grievance of the complainant. Hence, the complainant prays for revision of inflated bill.
The O.Ps deny the allegations made in the complaint petition.
Heard both the parties. Taking into consideration of the facts of the case we disposed of the case on the following direction:-
After observing the ledger status it is revealed that meter no.5167 was installed in January /February-2006 in O.K condition and it is found to be O.K till April-2014 but the billing was done on average / load factor basis from July-06 to March-12. From April-12 to April-14 the billing is done on actual basis . Hence, the bill of the consumer should be revised from July-06 to march-12 with initial reading 660 and final reading 3854 (3925-71) . The average comes to 3854- 660 - 69 months = 47 units per months. So the bill of the complainant is to be revised accordingly.
L A D Y M E M B E R. M EM B E R. P R E S I D E N T.
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.