DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM: BHADRAK

CONSUMER DISPUTES CASE NO.       91/ 2014

1. Sri Bikash Padhi

S/O Late Pradumna padhi

Vill/Po – Kishore Prasad.

            Ps- Bansada . District- Bhadrak.                ................Petitioner.                                                                                                                                              

                                       (Versus)

1. The  S.D.O Electrical, NESCO, Dhamara Electrical Sub- Division

At/po- Dhamara. District- Bhadrak.

1. The  Executive Engineer, Electrical, NESCO ,

North Electrical Division, Bypass, Bhadrak  …………  Opp. Parties.  

Advocate for Complainant :      Sri Giridhari Nath and Associates   

Advocate for Opposite parties.  Sri Debasis  Nayak & Associates.                                                             

Order No.28 dt. 22..05.2017

                  Both parties are absent. On perusal of record it is found that complainant is absent on 18 dates and last chance was given to complainant for hearing. It presumes that complainant is no more interested to proceed with the case. As such the complaint is dismissed for the default of the complainant.