Delhi

StateCommission

FA/575/2013

NIKHILESH JAIN - Complainant(s)

Versus

S.C. BANK - Opp.Party(s)

02 Sep 2014

ORDER

IN THE STATE COMMISSION DELHI
Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986
 
First Appeal No. FA/575/2013
(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. CC/173/2009 of District North)
 
1. NIKHILESH JAIN
410, GALI No.2, GANESH NAGAR-II, SHAKARPUR, DELHI-110092.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. S.C. BANK
3rd FLOOR, INDIAN EXPRESS BUILDING, 9-10, BAHADUR SHAH ZAFAR MARG, ITO, N.D.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL PRESIDENT
 HONABLE MRS. Salma Noor MEMBER
 HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE N.P KAUSHIK MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
ORDER

IN THE STATE COMMISSION: DELHI

(Constituted under section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)

 

           Date of decision: 02.09.2014

First Appeal- 575/2013

Nikhilesh Jain

S/o Sh. P.C. Jain

410, Gali No.2, Ganesh Nagar-II,

Shakarpur, Delhi-110092.                                                …..Appellant

 

VERSUS

1. Standard Charted Bank

Through Its Collection Manager (Auto Loan & Mileage Account)

3rd Floor, Indian Express Building,

9-10, Bahadur, Shah Zafar Mrg, ITO, New Delhi

 

2. Standard Charted Bank

Through Its Manager (Auto Loan)

17, Sansad Marg, New Delhi-110001.

                                                                                   …….Respondent

 

CORAM

 

Justice Veena Birbal, President

Salma Noor, Member

N P Kaushik, Member (Judicial)

 

1. Whether reporters of local newspaper be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the reporter or not?

 

Salma Noor, Member

 

 

1)           In a complaint case bearing no. 173/2009 Nikhilesh Jain Vs Standard Charted Bank, filed before District Forum North, Delhi the Complainant absented himself on 06.03.2012, the date fixed for hearing, and the Forum dismissed the complaint in complainant’s default.

2)            That is what brings the Complainant/ Appellant in appeal before this Commission.

3)       We have heard, counsel for the appellant in this appeal at the admission stage.

4)          The version of the Complainant appellant for his non appearance before the Forum is that

                                                                       There is no plausible reason not to rely and not to Act upon this version of the appellant. It has never been the policy of the law to stifle to contest and wherever possible, under the circumstances a lenient view in this regard has been recommended, so that the parities may have an opportunity to present their case before the Forum, so that the matter may be decided on merit. We therefore, allow the appeal setting aside the dismissal orders dt. 06.03.2012 in question, and remand the case back to District Forum North, Delhi with a direction to restore the complaint on its original number, and to further proceed in the case according to law, the Appellant Complainant is directed to appear before the District Forum North Delhi on 30.09.2014.  

5)              A copy of this order be sent to District Forum North, Delhi to keep it on complaint file and for compliance.

(Salma Noor)

Presiding Member

 

 

(N P Kaushik)

Member (Judicial)

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL]
PRESIDENT
 
[HONABLE MRS. Salma Noor]
MEMBER
 
[HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE N.P KAUSHIK]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.