Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/9/2013

A. RAMAN - Complainant(s)

Versus

S. SHANMUGASUNDARAM, K.S. HOSPITAL - Opp.Party(s)

B.Jayakumar-complt

31 Jan 2023

ORDER

      STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

           BEFORE    Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE  R. SUBBIAH           ::      PRESIDENT                       

                               Thiru.R.VENKATESA PERUMAL                     ::      MEMBER

 

 CC. No. 9/2013

 

                                                 DATED THIS THE 31^st  DAY OF JANUARY 2023

 

A.Raman,

No.1/610, Nakkeran Street,

Mugappair(East), Chennai

 

And having permanent Address at

No.2/359, T.Pudur, Sivaganga                                         ..Complainant

 

                                                Vs

 

1.Dr.S.Shanmugasundaram, M.D.D.M (Cardiology),

M/s K.S.Hospital,

No.442, (Old No 747) E.V.R.Periyar High Road,

Kilpauk, Chennai 600 010                                              ..1^st opposite party

 

2. M/s K.S.Hospital,

No.442, (Old No 747) E.V.R.Periyar High Road,

Kilpauk, Chennai 600 010                                              ..2^nd  opposite party

 

3. M/s Bilroth Hospitals Ltd,

Rep.by its Managing Director,

No. 3, Lakshmi Talkies Road,

Shenoy Nagar, Chennai 600 030                                   ..3^rd opposite party

 

4. M/s Madras Medical Mission Hospital,

Rep.by its Managing Director,

No.4-A, Dr.J.Jayalalitha Nagar,

Mogappair, Chennai 600 037                                         ..4^th opposite party

 

Counsel for the complainant                              : M/s B.Jayakumar

Counsel for the opposite parties 1 & 3                : M/s King and Partridge

Counsel for the 2^nd opposite party                     : M/s Paislobo  & Alvares

Counsel for the 4^th opposite party                      : M/s Paul & Paul

 

 

          This complaint is coming on before us for hearing, this commission made the following order in open court :  

Docket order

 

          No representation for complainant . Opposite parties present. This complaint is posted today for appearance of complainant and 2^nd opposite party and for arguments or for dismissal. When the matter was called at 11.00 A.M,  the complainant was not present  hence,  passed over and  called again at 12.30 noon, then also the complainant has not appeared. Hence we are of the view that keeping the complaint pending is of no use as the complainant is not interested in prosecuting the case.   The complaint is dismissed for default.  No order as to cost.

Sd/-                                                                                                           Sd/-

R VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                R.SUBBIAH

MEMBER                                                                                            PRESIDENT