Sanjeev Kumar Kaushik filed a consumer case on 07 Dec 2021 against Rudraskh Group in the Fatehgarh Sahib Consumer Court. The case no is RBT/CC/869/2018 and the judgment uploaded on 20 Apr 2022.
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, FATHGARH SAHIB.
RBT/ No
Complaint Case No: 869 of 2018
Date of Institution: 27.08.2018
Date of Decision: 07.12.2021
Sanjeev Kumar Kaushik S/o Dev Raj R/o Adarsh Nagar Tagore Street New Basti, Ward no.10, House no.201, Mansa , District Mansa.
...........Complainant
Vs.
.............Opposite Parties
Complaint Under Section 12 of Consumer Protection Act 1986(Old)
Quorum
Sh.Pushvinder Singh, President
Ms.Shivani Bhargava, Member
Sh.Manjit Singh Bhinder, Member
Present: Sh. Amrinderjit Singh Sandhu, Advocate counsel for the complainant
Opposite Party no.1 Ex-Parte.
Sh. Vikram SinghVohra, Advocate counsel for Opposite party no. 2
Complaint against OPno.3 not admitted.
ORDER
By Pushvinder Singh, President
The present complaint has been filed under Consumer Protection Act, by the complainant (hereinafter referred as ‘CC’ for short) against the Opposite Party (hereinafter referred as “OP” for short) Under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986(Old).
2. In this complaint, Sanjeev Kumar, Complainant stated that the OPs have duped the Complainant by taking Rs.45,576/- as principal amount with assurance of sending the complainant to Canada. The Ops promised complainant to send him to Canada vide contract agreement dated 25.10.2016 within 3 months and obtained all requisite documentation. The Ops also obtained an amount of Rs.9,50,000/- vide DD No.385750 dated 25.10.2016 and in addition to that Rs.30,576/- vide DD No.647707 dated 10.10.2016 and as such, the total amount of Rs.9,80,576/- . Despite repeated requests and visits of the complainant time and again, the OPs failed to sent the complainant to Canada as promised . However, Rs.9,35,000/- out of said amount has been returned through cheques. Still amount of Rs.45,576/- remains to be refunded by OPs. The Complainant also served a legal notice to the OP’s through his Advocate Amandeep Kansal on 26.03.2018 to pay the due balance refund amount along with interest to the tune of 18% but the OP’s failed to do so. Hence, this complaint filed for giving directions to the OPs to refund the amount of Rs.45,576/- as principle amount along with interest @ 18% P.A. from date of payment and compensation of an amount of Rs.25,000/- towards the cost of filing of the present complaint.
3 Notice of complaint was given to the OPs no.1 and 2, OP no.2 appeared and filed its written reply/version, raising preliminary objections, that the present complaint is based on false and frivolous story and the Complainant has not approached the Commission with clean hands and the complainant filed the present complaint just to grab the money from the OPs. On merit, OPs further alleged that there is no clause or point of any promise given by the OPs to the complainant in the agreement dated 25.10.2016 and also there is nowhere mentioned in the agreement with regard to the time period of three months as alleged by the complainant in his complaint. Out of the total amount i.e Rs.980576/-, the OPs have already refunded Rs.93,5000/- in different installments to the complainant. The OPs have done everything to complete the file of complainant but there were some documents which were not received on time from the complainant due to which process was delayed. Due to miscommunication between the Complainant and OPs cheques were dishonored , but OPs have transferred the amount later on, on regular basis to the complainant. The OPs never promised to provide Job offer to the complainant, the OPs only offered the help to the complainant to achieve his goals. The OPs have many times requested the complainant to collect his full and final payment and gave the clearance certificate but complainant refused to do so. Accordingly, OP. no.2 prayed for dismissal of the complaint with costs.
4. Notice of this complaint was sent to OP no.1 but OP choose not to appear to contest this complaint. Hence, OP. No.1 was proceeded against Ex-Parte.
5. Complaint against OP no.3 not admitted.
6. The CC produced the documents along with complaint as Ex.C1 to Ex.C6.
7. We have heard learned counsel for the complainant and have also gone through the record.
8. The complainant has filed the present complaint for directing the OPs to refund the amount of Rs.45576/- along with interest and compensation for damages. As per complaint, complainant paid an amount of Rs.9,80,576/- to the OPs no.1 and 2 and an agreement executed to this regard on dated 25.10.2016. The OPs promised the complainant to send him to Canada within three months and obtained all requisite documents. The OPs also received an amount of Rs.9,80,576/- by way of demand drafts dated 10.10.2016 and 25.10.2016. The complainant produced the copy of agreement as Ex.C-1. He also produced the copies of Demand Draft of Rs,9,50,000/- and Demand draft of Rs.30576/- dated 10.10.2016 as Ex.C-2. Copy of Statement of account as Ex.C-4 also proved by the complainant. Copies of cheques as Ex.C-5 also produced which were returned dishonoured due to “non sufficient funds” in the account of OPs and copy of Legal notice as Ex.C-6 also produced by the Complainant. He also proved calculations as Ex.C-7. The OP No.2 came forward to contest the Complaint and in its written statement OP No.2 has admitted the claim of the complainant. The OP No.2 also admitted the execution of agreement between the parties, dated 25.10.2016 . The OP No.2 has also admitted that an amount of Rs.45576 /-is due but the OP No.2 has alleged that the complainant was called to receive the amount of Rs.45576/- but he refused every time and demanded extra money from the OPs. The OP. No.1 has not come forward to contest the claim of the complainant. The OP No.2 came forward to contest the complaint and admitted that an amount of Rs.45576/- is due towards them. As such, we find that the complainant is entitled to recover an amount of Rs.45576/- from the OPs no.1 and 2. As the OPs no.1 and 2 used the money of the complainant then they are liable to pay the interest to the complainant and simple interest @ 9% P. A shall be reasonable rate of interest.
9. In view of aforesaid discussion, complaint is allowed against the OPs no.1 and 2 and they are directed to pay Rs.45576/- to the complainant along with simple rate of interest @ 9% P.A. from the date of payment till realization. The complainant is also entitled for Rs.10,000/- as compensation and the litigation expenses. The liability of OPs no.1 and 2 shall be joint and several. Compliance of this order be made by OPs no.1 and 2 within thirty days from the date of receipt of free certified copy of the order, failing which the CC shall be entitled to recover the above said amount by filing Execution. Certified copy of the order be supplied to the complainant and the OPs as per rules. File be sent back to the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Mohali for consignment.
Announced
December 07, 2021
(Pushvinder Singh)
President
(Shivani Bhargava)
Member
(Manjit Singh Bhinder)
Member
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.