NCDRC

NCDRC

FA/928/2021

M/S. TDI INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. - Complainant(s)

Versus

RUCHIKA BHATIA - Opp.Party(s)

M/S. SKV ASSOCIATES

20 Apr 2023

ORDER

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
FIRST APPEAL NO. 928 OF 2021
 
(Against the Order dated 05/10/2020 in Complaint No. 1309/2017 of the State Commission Delhi)
1. M/S. TDI INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.
THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR , MAHINDRA TOWR , 2A, BHIKAJI CAMA PLACE SECOND FLOOR
NEW DELHI 110 006
...........Appellant(s)
Versus 
1. RUCHIKA BHATIA
D/O. SHIR BB BHATIA , R/O. H 9, SAI APARTMENTS SECTOR 13, ROHINI
NEW DELHI
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. DINESH SINGH,PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KARUNA NAND BAJPAYEE,MEMBER

For the Appellant :
Mr. Vaibhav Agnihotri, Advocate with
Mr. Ankit Khera, Advocate
For the Respondent :
Ms. Ruchika Bhatia (In person)

Dated : 20 April 2023
ORDER

1.       This appeal has been filed under section 51(1) of the Act 2019 in challenge to the Order dated 05.10.2020 of the State Commission in complaint no. 1309 of 2017.

2.       We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant (the ‘builder co.’) and the respondent in person (‘the complainant’) and have perused the record.

3.       The matter pertains to a builder-buyer dispute. The award made by the State Commission vide its impugned Order dated 05.10.2020 is reproduced below for reference:

“21. In view of the above discussion I direct Op-1 to refund Rs. 25,23,541/- with interest @ 12% simple interest as agreed, from the dates of payment till the date of refund within 45 days from the receipt of copy of this judgment."

4.       Learned counsel for the appellant submits, on instructions, that, in the particular facts and circumstances of the present case (alone), as a goodwill gesture, it will not agitate the matter any more and will comply with the award made by the State Commission vide its impugned Order of 05.10.2020 within four months from today. He further requests that the issues involved may be kept open and this may not be treated as a precedent.

5.       In the wake of the above submissions nothing further survives to be adjudicated and the instant appeal stands disposed of with the direction that the award made by the State Commission vide its impugned Order dated 05.10.2020 shall be made good by the builder co. within four months from today, failing which the State Commission shall forthwith undertake execution, for ‘enforcement’ and for ‘penalty’, as per the law.

The issues involved are kept open and the decision in this case shall not be treated as a precedent.

6.       The Registry is requested to send a copy each of this Order to the parties in the appeal and to their learned counsel immediately. The stenographer is requested to upload this Order on the website of this Commission, immediately. 

 
......................
DINESH SINGH
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
 
......................J
KARUNA NAND BAJPAYEE
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.