NCDRC

NCDRC

MA/418/2023

M/S TDI INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. - Complainant(s)

Versus

RUCHIKA BHATIA - Opp.Party(s)

SKV ASSOCIATES

15 Sep 2023

ORDER

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 418 OF 2023
IN
FA/928/2021
1. M/S TDI INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.
SECOND FLOOR, MAHINDRA TOWERS 2A, BHIKAJI CAMA PLACE, RAMA KRISHNA PURAM, NEW DELHI -
SOUTH WEST
DELHI
...........Appellants(s)
Versus 
1. RUCHIKA BHATIA
RIO H-9 SAI APARTMENTS SECTOR-13, ROHINI
S.A.S NAGAR
PUNJAB
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KARUNA NAND BAJPAYEE,PRESIDING MEMBER

FOR THE APPELLANT :
FOR THE APPLICANT/ APPELLANT / : MS. KANIKA AGNIHOTRI, ADVOCATE WITH
MR. ANKIT KHERA, ADVOCATED
FOR THE RESPONDENT :
FOR THE NON-APPLICANT / RESPONDENT : IN PERSON

Dated : 15 September 2023
ORDER

1.       Learned counsel for the applicant / appellant submits that the Order that was passed by this Commission on 20.04.2023 on consent but the same could not be complied with within the stipulated period of time as was mentioned in the Order. Learned counsel has tried to explain the circumstances under which the Order could not complied with within the stipulated period of time and has taken to the contents of the M.A. No. 418 of 2023 that has been moved in this regard. Learned counsel also submits that an amount of Rs. 5,00,000/- has already been deposited in the State Commission on 06.07.2023. Learned counsel further submits that a cheque dated 22.08.2023 for a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- is also being handed over to the non-applicant / respondent / complainant today in the Court. Submission is that further time may be granted / extended so that the Order in question may be complied with in its entirety.

2.       Non-applicant / respondent / complainant has also been heard who has appeared in person today.

3.       Learned counsel for the applicant / appellant submits, on instructions, that the entire remaining outstanding amount shall be made good to the complainant in equal monthly instalments within a period of six months from today.

4.       Non-applicant / respondent / complainant who is present in person is agreeable with the offer made by the applicant / appellant. 

5.       Looking into overall facts and circumstances of the case, it is deemed appropriate that remaining outstanding amount shall be made good to the non-applicant / respondent / complainant in equal monthly instalments within a period of four months from today.

6.       It goes without saying that in case, the payment is not made good by the applicant / appellant within the aforesaid stipulated period of time, the State Commission shall forthwith undertake execution proceedings, for ‘enforcement’ and for ‘penalty’, as per the law. 

7.       With these observations, the present miscellaneous application stands disposed of.

 
..................................................J
KARUNA NAND BAJPAYEE
PRESIDING MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.