Karnataka

Bangalore Urban

CC/12/202

Sri Bidlur Shivaprakash - Complainant(s)

Versus

Royal Garden City Enterprises Private Limited - Opp.Party(s)

Ravi Benjamin

05 Jul 2012

ORDER

BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM (Principal)
8TH FLOOR, CAUVERY BHAVAN, BWSSB BUILDING, BANGALORE-5600 09.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/12/202
 
1. Sri Bidlur Shivaprakash
S/o B R Adhinarayan,presently Residing at No.373,42nd cross,1st main,8th block,Jayanagar,B'lore-82
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Royal Garden City Enterprises Private Limited
A company incorporated under the companies act 1956,No.10/5,Benson Cross Road,Benson Cross Road,B'lore
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

 

COMPLAINTS FILED ON:30.01.2012

DISPOSED ON:05.07.2012

 

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM AT BANGALORE (URBAN)

5th DAY OF JULY-2012

 

  PRESENT:-  SRI. B.S. REDDY                     PRESIDENT       

                      SRI.A.MUNIYAPPA                           MEMBER                

 

COMPLAINT Nos.202/2012

       

Complainant

 

 

Bidlur Shivaprakash

S/o B.R.Adhinarayan,

Aged about 48 years,

Presently residing at No.373,

42nd Cross, 1st Main,

8th Block, Jayanagar,

Bangalore-560 082.

 

Adv:Sri.H.Pavana Chandra Shetty

 

    V/s

 

OPPOSITE PARTY

 

Royal Garden City

Enterprises Private limited,

A Company incorporated under the Companies Act,1956,

Having its registered Office

at No.10/5,

Benson Cross Road,

Benson Town,

Bangalore-560 046, Represented by its CMD Collins Benjamin.

 

Placed Ex-parte.

 

O R D E R

SRI. B.S.REDDY, PRESIDENT

 

The complainant filed this complaint Under Section-12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 seeking direction against the Opposite Party (herein after called as O.P) to refund an amount of Rs.17,00,000/- with interest at 24% p.a. and to pay compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- on the allegation of deficiency in service on the part of the OP.

           

2. The notice issued to OP was returned as not claimed and information delivered.   Op failed to appear without any justifiable cause, hence placed ex-parte.

 

3. In order to substantiate complaint averments, complainant filed affidavit evidence and produced documents. 

4.  Arguments from complainant’s side heard.

 

5. We have gone through the complaint averments, the documents produced and affidavit evidence of the complainant.  On the basis of these materials it becomes clear that the Sales representative of the OP-Company approached complainant and persuaded to purchase a Villa to be constructed, by OP in the land Sy.Nos.53/1, 53/2, 63/1, 63/2 and 54 situated at Galipooje Village, Kasaba Hobli, Doddaballapur Taluk, Bangalore Rural District.   The complainant was not provided with the brochures as promised.   However in terms of booking agreement, the complainant has paid an amount of Rs.16,20,000/- and has signed the booking agreement.  In terms of the booking agreement, the project had to be completed in 18/24 months and it was also agreed that a separate Construction Agreement would be entered into.    However there was no progress in the project and OP has not executed any construction agreement and committed breach of the agreement.    The complainant got issued Legal Notice dt.22.11.2010, calling upon the OP to refund the amount paid with interest at 24% p.a.   OP has not complied the demand nor replied the notice.    Though the complainant claims that he has paid Rs.17,00,000/- but the documents produced to show that only he has paid Rs.16,20,000/-.   The act of OP neither developing the layout and constructing the Villa nor refunding the amount, amounts to deficiency in service.   When OP was not able to fulfill its obligations, it would have been fair enough on its part to refund the amount received.   The very fact of OP remaining ex-parte leads to draw inference that Op is admitting the claim of the complainant.   There is no reason to disbelieve the unchallenged affidavit evidence of the complainant and documents produced.    The complainant is entitled for refund of the amount of Rs.16,20,000/- with interest at 18% p.a. by way of compensation from the respective date of payment, till the date of realization and litigation cost of Rs.2,000/-.   Accordingly, we proceed to pass the following:

O R D E R

       

        The complaint filed by the complainant is allowed in part.

Op is directed to refund an amount of Rs.16,20,000/- with interest at 18% p.a. from the respective date of payments, till the date of realization and pay litigation cost of Rs.2,000/- to the complainant.

 

This order is to be complied within four weeks from the date of its communication.

 

Send copy of this order to both the parties free of costs.

 

 

(Dictated to the Stenographer and typed in the computer and transcribed by her verified and corrected, and then pronounced in the Open Court by us on this the 5th day of JULY-2012.)

                                                                                                  

 

 

MEMBER                                               PRESIDENT

Cs.

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.