Kerala

Thiruvananthapuram

CC/19/254

Arun G Krishanan - Complainant(s)

Versus

Royal Enfield - Opp.Party(s)

29 Jul 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACADU THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

 

PRESENT

                           SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN         : PRESIDENT

                           SMT.PREETHA G NAIR      : MEMBER

                           SRI.VIJU.V.R                       : MEMBER

CC.NO.254/2019 (Filed on : 09/08/2019)

ORDER DATED : 29/07/2022

COMPLAINANT

Arun G Krishnan,

S/o.S.Gopalakrishnan Nair,

Mathanpalakkal House,

Vakkom.P.O, Thiruvananthapuram – 695 308

 

Rep.by his father, Power of Attorney Holder,

S.Gopalakrishnan Nair, S/o.Sreedharan Pillai,

Mathanpalakkal House, Vakkom.P.O

Thiruvananthapuram – 695 308

 

(By Adv.N.Sailendran)

                                                     VS

 

OPPOSITE PARTIES

1. Mr.Shyam,

             Chief Executive for Sales,

             Authorized dealer of Royal Enfield,

             Concept Bikes, Fayaz Building,

             T.B.Junction, Attingal, Thiruvananthapuram

           2. The C.E.O

              Royal Enfield Kerala & Lakshadweep,

             (Opp) I.O.C.Pump, Koonamthai,

              Edapally.P.O, Kochi – 682 024

           3. The Manufacturer,

              CLS 350- Storm rider,

              Royal Enfield Factory,

              Chennai, Tamil Nadu     

              (Ops 2 & 3 by Adv.Suja Madhav)

ORDER

SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN                : PRESIDENT

1. This complaint is filed under section 12 of Consumer Protection Act 1986 and stood over to this date for consideration and this Commission passed the following order.

2.   This is a complaint filed by the complainant against the opposite parties alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties. After admitting the complaint, notice was issued to the opposite parties. The opposite parties 2 & 3 entered appearance. The notice issued to the first opposite party was returned with endorsement “addressee left”. Subsequently the complainant was directed to take steps against the first opposite party. The complainant has not taken any steps against the first opposite party, inspite of giving sufficient opportunities for the same. As the complainant was continuously absent and not taken any steps against first opposite party, this Commission issued a notice to the complainant to appear before this Commission today to further proceed with this complaint. The notice issued to the complainant was served. The complainant not appeared or taken any steps against the first opposite party. In the above circumstances, we find that the complainant is not interested for further proceed with this complaint.  

                    In the result, the complaint is dismissed for default. There will be no order as to costs.

        A copy of this order as per the statutory requirements be forwarded to the parties free of charge and thereafter the file be consigned to the record room.

               Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the Open Commission, this the 29^th day of July 2022.

 

                                                                                           Sd/-

P.V.JAYARAJAN    : PRESIDENT

 

                                                                                      Sd/-

        PREETHA G NAIR      : MEMBER

 

                                                                                        Sd/-

                          VIJU.V.R        : MEMBER

 

be/