Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/39/2015

C.Ramesh, S/o.A.Chelladurai - Complainant(s)

Versus

Royal Builders, Rep by its Partner Mr. D.Easa Thilagar, and 2 others - Opp.Party(s)

M/s.S.Rajesh-Complt

25 Aug 2022

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

                                  BEFORE    Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE  R. SUBBIAH           ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                                        Thiru.S.KARUPPIAH                                       ::  JUDICIAL  MEMBER

 

 CC. No. 39/2015

                                                                         DATED THIS THE 25^th  DAY OF AUGUST 2022

 C.Ramesh,

S/o A.Chelladurai,

Door No. D3, Vasantham Nagar,

Prithivakkam,

Ambattur,

Chennai – 600 053                                                  ..complainant

 

                                            Vs

 

1.Royal Builders,

Rep.by its partner Mr.D.Easa Thilagar,

No.1, Raj complex,

Camp Road Junction,

Selaiyur,

Chennai – 600 073  

 

 

2. Mr.D.Easa Thilagar,

S/o Mr.David,

Partner, M/s Royal Builders,

No.1, Raj Complex,

Camp Road Junction,

Selaiyur,

Chennai – 600 073  

 

3. Mr.N.Kamaraj

Partner, M/s Royal Builders,

No.1, Raj Complex,

Camp Road Junction,

Selaiyur,

Chennai – 600 073                                    ..opposite parties

 

Counsel for the complainant                      : M/s S.Rajesh

Counsel for the ops 1 to 3                         : M/s Benedick Vincent

 

          This complaint is coming on before us for hearing today, this commission made the following order in open court :-

                                              Docket order

          No representation for both. This complaint is posted today for appearance of both and for filing written argument of complainant and for filing written argument of complainant and for arguments in list or for dismissal. When the matter was called at 11.00 A.M, the complainant was not present hence, passed over and called again at 12.40 noon, then also the complainant has not appeared. Though sufficient time granted steps not taken to amend the cause title till date. Hence we are of the view that keeping the complaint pending is of no use as the complainant is not interested in prosecuting the case. The complaint is dismissed for default. No order as to cost.

   Sd/-                                                                                                           Sd/-                           

S.KARUPPIAH                                                                                          R.SUBBIAH

JUDL.MEMBER                                                                                         PRESIDENT