NCDRC

NCDRC

FA/271/2006

SHRI MANGE LAL RUSTOGI AND ANR. - Complainant(s)

Versus

ROHINI HOSPITAL AND ORS - Opp.Party(s)

G.D.RUSTAGI

15 Oct 2010

ORDER


NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIAPPEAL NO. 271 OF 2006
(Against the Order dated 01/05/2006 in Complaint No. 19/1994 of the State Commission Delhi)
1. SHRI MANGE LAL RUSTOGI AND ANR.B-6/238, SECTOR -5, ROHINI DELHI - 110085 ...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. ROHINI HOSPITAL AND ORS156/POCKET OO, AMARPALI, SECTOR -1, ROHINI DELHI - 1100852. Dr.Anil Johar, Pocket - D 15, Sector 7, Rohini,Delhi - 110085 ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. ANUPAM DASGUPTA ,PRESIDING MEMBER
For the Appellant :NEMO
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 15 Oct 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

No one is present on behalf of the applicant/appellant.  It would appear that the grievance of the applicant/appellant has since been resolved and he has received the full amount of settlement viz. Rs.2,68,000/-.  The application is, therefore, deemed to have been disposed of.



......................ANUPAM DASGUPTAPRESIDING MEMBER