Maharashtra

DCF, South Mumbai

144/2005

rajesh r. dikshit - Complainant(s)

Versus

rockline construction - Opp.Party(s)

SHAILESH SHUKLA

18 Oct 2013

ORDER

 
Complaint Case No. 144/2005
 
1. rajesh r. dikshit
6/4 NAVSHAKTI CHSL. NEHRU NGR. KANJURMARG EAST
MUMBAI 42
MAHARASHTRA
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. rockline construction
RAJABHADUR MANSION 26 FORT
MUMBAI 23
MAHARASHTRA
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'ABLE MR. Satyashil M. Ratnakar PRESIDENT
 HON'ABLE MR. G.H. Rathod MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
तक्रारदार गैरहजर.
 ......for the Complainant
 
सामनेवाला गैरहजर.
 ......for the Opp. Party
ORDER

Order Below Exhibit 1

 

PER SHRI. S.M. RATNAKAR – HON’BLE  PRESIDENT

             The Complainant and his Advocate Shri. Shailesh Shukla are absent even after issuance of notices. The Opposite Party and their Advocate are also absent. The Complainant is absent for more than 1 year.  As both the Advocates are absent for oral arguments, therefore, the complaint is dismissed in default of the complainant with no order as to cost. 

 
 
[HON'ABLE MR. Satyashil M. Ratnakar]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'ABLE MR. G.H. Rathod]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.