West Bengal

Howrah

CC/13/444

SRI. BHASKAR CHATTERJEE - Complainant(s)

Versus

RIYAJUL HAQUE - Opp.Party(s)

21 Jul 2014

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM HOWRAH
20, Round Tank Lane, Howrah – 711 101.
(033) 2638-0892; 0512 E-Mail:- confo-hw-wb@nic.in Fax: - (033) 2638-0892
 
Complaint Case No. CC/13/444
 
1. SRI. BHASKAR CHATTERJEE
S/O- Late Jogendra Nath Chatterjee, 39/4/2, Deshpran Sasmal Road, P.S.- Bantra, Howrah-711 101.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. RIYAJUL HAQUE
S/O- Late Anarul Haque, 42/2, Jola Para Masjid Lane, P.S. & Dist.- 711 101.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE T.K. Bhattacharya PRESIDENT
 HON'ABLE MR. P.K. Chatterjee MEMBER
 HON'ABLE MRS. Smt. Jhumki Saha MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

DATE OF FILING                    :     20-12-2013.

DATE OF S/R                            :      27-01-2014.

DATE OF FINAL ORDER      :     21-07-2013.

 

Sri Bhaskar  Chatterjee,

son of late Jogendra Nath  Chatterjee,

residing at 39/4/2, Deshpran  Sasmal Road, P.S. Bantra,

District – Howrah,

PIN – 711101.----------------------------------------------------------------- COMPLAINANT.

 

-          Versus   -

 

Riyajul Haque,

son of late Anarul haque,

residing at 24/2, Jolapara Masjid Lane,

P.S. & District – Howrah.

PIN  – 711101.-----------------------------------------------------------------OPPOSITE PARTY.

 

                                                P    R    E     S    E    N     T

 

 

President     :     Shri T.K. Bhattacharya, M.A. LL.B. WBHJS.

Member      :      Shri P.K. Chatterjee.

Member       :     Smt. Jhumki Saha.

                         

                                                 F  I   N   A    L       O   R   D    E     R

 

 

1.               The instant case was filed by complainant U/S 12 of the C.P. Act, 1986 wherein the complainant has  prayed for direction upon the o.p. to complete the pending works as mentioned in para 16(b) of the schedule mentioned property wherein the complainant is in possession of a flat by virtue of purchase from the o.p. and to pay compensation of Rs. 8 lakhs for causing mental pain and prolonged harassment together with litigation costs of Rs. 25,000.

 

2.               The o.p. in his  written version admitted that due to Court Case ( T.S. 139 of 2010 pending before the Civil Judge, Jr. Division, 7th Court, Howrah ) the works of the flat might have remained unfinished. 

 

 

3.        Upon pleadings of both parties two points arose for determination :

 

i)          Is there any deficiency in service on the part of the O.P.  ?

ii)                  Whether the complainant is  entitled to get any relief as prayed for ? 

 

 

 

 

 

DECISION  WITH   REASONS      :

 

 

4.               Both the points are  taken up together for consideration. Admittedly the complainant is in possession of the suit flat by virtue of purchase from the o.p. Admittedly the o.p. agreed to deliver full finished flat within two years from the date of agreement. But unfortunately the flat handed over to the complainant is found considerably unfinished. 

 

5.               On scrutiny of the enclosures and the deed of agreement it is palpable that o.p. is guilty of gross deficiency in service and therefore it is a fit case where the prayer of the complainant shall be allowed. Both the points are accordingly disposed of.

 

      Hence,

                       

O     R     D      E      R      E        D

 

           

 

      That the C. C. Case No.  444 of 2013 ( HDF 444  of 2013 )  be  and the same is allowed on contest as against the o.p.   

 

      The O.P. be directed to  complete the unfinished works within 60 days from the date of this order and to pay compensation to the tune of Rs. 50,000/- for causing mental pain and prolonged harassment  within 30 days from the date of this order

     

      The o.p. do further  pay a sum of Rs. 5,000/- towards litigation costs to the complainant within the period as mentioned above.

     

      The complainant is at liberty to put the decree into execution after expiry of the appeal period.

       

      Supply the copies of the order to the parties, as per rule.

     

 

DICTATED  &    CORRECTED

BY   ME.  

 

                                                                   

  (    T.K. Bhattacharya  )                                              

  President,  C.D.R.F.,Howrah.

 
 
[HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE T.K. Bhattacharya]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'ABLE MR. P.K. Chatterjee]
MEMBER
 
[HON'ABLE MRS. Smt. Jhumki Saha]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.