Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that despite demand, Respondent No.2 Society has refused to furnish a statement of account of the petitioner, as maintained by them in their records.  In view of the submission, I proceed to hear learned counsel for the petitioner.

        The short grievance of the petitioner is that the direction by the State Commission to Respondent No.2 to issue a No-Objection Certificate to the complainant, after receiving the amount, as indicated in Para-3 of the order, would adversely affect the rights of the petitioner Federation, in as much as the Society has created a mortgage in their favour by deposit of the Title Deeds of the property in question.

There is no merit in the submission.  An inter se dispute between the Federation and the Society cannot deprive the respondent/complainant of the Title Deeds of the property after he discharges the debt towards the Society, in terms of the impugned order.

        Consequently, the Revision Petition preferred by the Federation, being devoid of any merit, is dismissed.