Arti Gujral filed a consumer case on 29 Sep 2014 against Rishab Bhardwaj in the West Delhi Consumer Court. The case no is CC/14/638 and the judgment uploaded on 06 Jun 2016.
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM (WEST)
GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI
150-151, Community Centre, C-Block, Janak Puri, New Delhi – 110058
Date of institution : 25.9.14
Case. No.DF-III/638/2014/ Date of order : 6.6.16
In the matter of :-
Mrs. Arti Gujral and Nitin Gujral
A-3/46, Janak Puri,
New Delhi-110058 Complainants
Vs.
Sh. Rishab Bhardwaj,
Journey Trip.com
Shop No.309, C4C Market,
Near Surajmal Institute, Janak Puri,
New Delhi-110058. Opposite Party
(R.S. BAGRI, PRESIDENT)
O R D E R
The brief relevant facts for disposal of the present complaint are that Ms. Arti Gujral and Nitin Gujral, complainants booked a package for 4 persons for Thailand with Rishab Bhardwaj from Journey trip.com (OP) on 24.7.14 for 9.8.14 for a sum of Rs. 1,02,000/- on payment of advance amount of Rs. 60,000/-. On 31.7.14 Grand mother of the complainants was hospitalized in critical condition. Therefore, the complainants cancelled the trip on the same day and unfortunately the grand mother of the complainants expired on 03.08.14.
-2-
When the complainants contacted the opposite party for refund of the advance. The opposite party told the complainants that the whole money is with Jet Airways and the complainants could get refund of Rs. 20,000/-only from the advance of Rs. 60,000/- as the complainants failed to produce death certificate of their grand mother. The complainants provided death certificate of their grand mother to the opposite party. Who told that it will take one and half months to refund the amount by Jet Airlines. The complainants asked them to provide their PNR and ticket numbers so that they could check status of their refund with the Jet Airlines. But the opposite party postponed on one pretext or the other and lastly refused to supply their PNR Number and ticket Numbers.
The opposite party on 9.9.14 promised that payment will be released after deducting Rs. 1800-2000/- per ticket by the Airlines. On 17.9.14, the opposite party refused to refund any amount as Jet Airlines has refunded Rs. 42,000/- only. He further told that as per the terms and conditions , the opposite party is entitled to adjust entire advance as the trip was cancelled by the complainants within 10 days from departure. Hence, the present complaint for direction to the opposite party to pay sum of Rs. 60,000/- of advance money and compensation of Rs. 4.00 lacs towards physical strain, mental pain, agony and sufferings to the complainants.
,
Notice of the complaint was sent to the opposite party. The opposite party appeared. The opposite party failed to file reply despite availing many opportunities subject to payment of cost . But on 01.10.15 neither opposite
-3-
party nor his counsel appeared to pay conditional cost and to file its reply. Therefore, opposite party was proceeded against ex-parte vide order dated 1.10.15.
When the complainants were asked to lead ex-parte evidence. The complainant Ms. Arti Gujral one of the complainants filed her affidavit wherein she has again narrated facts of the complaint. The complainant in support of their case have also relied upon photocopies of invoice No.WVH/JT/20000811 dated 24.7.14, detail and terms and conditions of the booking dated 24.7.14. E-mails of the complainants dated 9.9.14 and 10.9.14, 12.9.14 and death certificate of Smt. Santosh Kumari.
We have heard the complainants in person and have gone through the material on record carefully and thoroughly.
From the perusal of the death certificate of Smt Santosh Kumari, it reveals that she died on 3.8.14. It further reveals that the complainants on 24.7.14 booked trip of Thailand for 9.8.14 for a sum of Rs. Rs. 1,02,000/- on payment of Rs. 60,000/- as advance with the opposite party. The complainant asked the opposite party to cancel the trip and refund the advance. On 31.7.14 as their grand mother was hospitalized in serious condition and she died on 3.8.11. Cancellation policy of the opposite party is as under :-
-4-
It further reveals that the opposite party refused to refund the advance as the advance paid by the complainants is struck with the Jet Airlines and hotel.
The version of the complainants and documents relied upon by them have remained un-rebutted and unchallenged. Therefore, there is no reason to disbelieve the un-rebutted and unchallenged version and evidence of the complainants. The complainants from the un-rebutted and unchallenged version and evidence have been able to prove that they booked four seats with opposite party on 24.7.14 for 9.8.14 for a sum of Rs. 1,02,000/- on payment of Rs. 60,000/- as advance. But unfortunately, their grand mother seriously fell ill on 31.7.14 and died on 3.8.14. Therefore, they had to cancel the trip. The cancellation of the trip and booking was beyond the control of the complainants for unseen and unavoidable circumstances. The opposite party denied to refund the advance on the ground that the amount paid by the complainant is struck with Jet Airlines and hotel but there is nothing on the file to show that how much amount is paid by the opposite party to Jet Airlines for booking the ticket for the complainant and how much advance money is paid to hotel
For booking accommodation for the complainants as the opposite party failed to supply tickets, PNR numbers and reservation of hotel to the complainant. The cancellation policy is of no help to the opposite party. First of all the booking was made on 24.7.14 for 9.8.14 and as per the terms and conditions of the cancellation policy in case of cancellation of holiday trip in less then 30 days prior to departure 30% holiday cost or minimum Rs. 20,000/- which ever is higher is to be adjusted, 70% is to be adjusted in case of cancellation within 10-12 days and 100% adjusted in case of cancellation within 6-10 days. The cancellation was due to unseen circumstances and death of close relation (grand mother of the complainants). Therefore, they could not go on holiday trip within 5-7 days of death of their grand mother. Even if the opposite party had paid any money to Jet Airways for booking of tickets for complainants, the cost of the ticket is refundable after deduction of nominal amount. The hotel also can refund the amount after deducting some amount as the complainants intimated the opposite party for cancellation of the trip on 31.7.14 and the trip was to commence on 9.8.14. Hence, non refunding of advance money by the opposite party after adjusting the amount if any deducted by Jet Airways and hotel amounts unfair-trade-practice and deficiency of service . Hence, the complainants are entitled for refund of their money paid by them to the opposite party as advance after adjusting the amount actually paid by the opposite party to Jet Airways and hotel.
In the light of above discussion and observations, the complainants succeeded to establish and prove that there is unfair-trade-practice on the part of the opposite party. The complainants are entitled for refund of their advance money.
Therefore, we direct the opposite party to refund to complainant advance of Rs. 60,000/- received by them from the complainants, after adjusting the actual amount retained/deducted by the Jet Airways and hotel, if any. The complainants are also entitled for compensation of Rs. 10,000/- towards mental pain, agony, sufferings and litigation expenses.
Order pronounced on : 06.06.2016
(PUNEET LAMBA) (URMILA GUPTA) ( R.S. BAGRI )
MEMBER MEMBER PRESIDENT
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.