Kerala

Alappuzha

CC/212/2010

K.B. Unnikrishanan - Complainant(s)

Versus

Rep. by its Secretary, SNDP Sakha Yogam Branch No. 363 & another - Opp.Party(s)

30 Apr 2011

ORDER

 
CC NO. 212 Of 2010
 
1. K.B. Unnikrishanan
Chithralayam, Kalarkode.P.O., Alappuzha
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Rep. by its Secretary, SNDP Sakha Yogam Branch No. 363 & another
Kakkazham, Alappuzha
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONORABLE JIMMY KORAH PRESIDENT
 HONORABLE K.Anirudhan Member
 HONORABLE Smt;Shajitha Beevi Member
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

 

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, ALAPPUZHA

Saturday the 30th   day of  April, 2011

Filed on 13.09.2010

Present

  1. Sri. Jimmy Korah (President)
  2. Sri. K. Anirudhan (Member)
  3. Smt. Shajitha Beevi (Member)

in

C.C.No.212/10

between

Complainant:-                                                                     Opposite Parties:-

 

Sri. K.B. Unnikrishnan                                            1.         SNDP Sakha Yogam No.363
Chithralayam                                                                      Rep. its Secretary,

Kalarcode P.O.                                                                  Kakkazhom, Neerkkunnam

Alappuzha                                                                          Alappuzha

(By Adv. Laly Joseph)

                                                                              2.         Sri.K.Bhaskaran, Secretary

                                                                                          SNDP Sakha Yogam No.363

                                                                                          Kakkazhom, S/o Kesavan

                                                            Anavelil House

                                                            Neerkkunnam, Alappuzha

                                                              

O R D E R

SRI. K. ANIRUDHAN (MEMBER)

          

Sri.K.B.Unnikrishnan  has filed this complaint before the Forum on 13.09.2010 alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties. The brief facts of the allegations of the complainant are as follows:-  The opposite parties have assured the depositor that they will give investors @ 18% interest per annum for the deposits payable on monthly basis.  The entire action of the Sakha Yogam is being carried out by the Secretary.  He had deposited a total sum of Rs.2,00,000/- before the Sakha Yogam on 31.8.2006 and on 15.9.2006 he had deposited Rs.1 lakh.  The opposite parties issued pass book and that they have not paid interest.  The period of deposit was  fixed for  five years.  Thereafter the opposite parties failed to pay the interest or repayment of the deposited amount till date, even though he had requested to return the amount.  Since there was no positive steps to return the amount, he filed this complaint seeking relief.

            2.   Notices were issued to the opposite parties, they had not   appeared before this Forum.  Considering their absence, they were set exparte by this Forum. 

            3. Considering the allegations of the complainant, this Forum has  raised the following issues:-

            1) Whether there is any deficiently in service and negligence on the part of the

                opposite parties in repayment of fixed deposit to the complainant?

           

2) Whether the complainant is entitled to get compensation and costs from the

               opposite parties?

          5. Issues 1 and 2:- Complainant has filed proof affidavit and produced two documents in evidence – Exts.A1 and A2 were marked. Ext. A1 is the  Pass book showing the deposit of Rs.2 lakhs dt. 15.9.2006 and showing the acceptance of Rs.1 lakh from the complainant by Sri. K. Bhaskaran, Secretary.  Ext.A2 is the Power of Attorney deed.   

6. On a careful study of the entire matter of this case, it can be seen that as per the assurance given by the opposite parties, the complainant had deposited the amount in the Sakha Yogam administered by the opposite parties.   The  opposite parties had not paid  interest to the complainant for the deposit amount.  The opposite parties had denied the repayment of the principal amount and its interest to the complainant in spite of the repeated requests.  But the opposite parties have not shown any  effort to return the same in time. This will amounts to cheating. The entire actions on the part of the opposite parties shows the deficiency in service and negligence by way of refusal to repay the deposited amount  with interest to the complainant in time. There is no justification on the part of the opposite parties in retaining the amount with them which is payable to the complainant. The entire action of the opposite parties shows their irresponsible attitude towards this transaction.  The complainant is fully entitled to get back the deposited amounts with interest from the opposite parties. Since there is deficiency in service and negligence on the part of the opposite parties by way purposeful denial of  repayment of the deposited amount to the complainant in time, the complainant is entitled to get compensation and costs from the opposite parties and that the opposite parties are jointly and severely liable for that.  Considering, the whole aspects of this case, we are fully convinced that the allegations put forward by the complainant against the opposite parties are highly genuine. So the complaint is to be allowed.   All the issues are found in favour of the complainant.

            In the result, for the ends of justice, we hereby direct the opposite parties to return the deposited  amount of Rs. 3,00,000/- (Rupees three lakhs only) to the complainant along with 18% interest per annum from the date of deposit,   till the date of repayment of the entire amount  and pay a compensation of Rs. 2,000/- (Rupees two thousand only) to the complainant for his mental agony, pain, sufferings, inconvenience and loss due to the grossest deficiency in service and culpable negligence on the part of the opposite parties by way of refusal to pay back the deposited amounts and its interest in time to the complainant, and further pay a sum of Rs. 1,000/- (Rupees one thousand only) as cost of this proceedings. We further direct the opposite parties to pay the above said amounts to the complainant within the 30 days from the date of receipt of this order.

            Pronounced in open Forum on this the 30th    day of  April, 2011.

                                                                                                                                   

                                                                                                 

                                                                                               

                                                                                                Sd/-  Sri.K. Anidudhan:

                                   

                                  Sd/- Sri. Jimmy Korah:

                                                                                                  

                                                                                                Sd/- Smt. N. Shajitha Beevi:

 

 

 

 

 

Appendix:-

 

Evidence of the complainant:- 

 

Ext. A1                -                   Pass Book

Ext.A2                 -                   Power of Attorney deed                                   

 

 

Evidence of the opposite parties:- Nil

 

 

// True Copy //

                                                                                                                        By Order

 

 

To                                                                                                        Senior Superintendent

            Complainant/Opposite parties/ S.F.

 

 

Typed by:-pr/- 

 

Compared by:-

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HONORABLE JIMMY KORAH]
PRESIDENT
 
[HONORABLE K.Anirudhan]
Member
 
[HONORABLE Smt;Shajitha Beevi]
Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.